IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sun, 02 October 2022 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18629C14F74F for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 08:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQcOmwk6DBwF for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 08:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-f49.google.com (mail-oa1-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99882C14F741 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2022 08:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-12c8312131fso10571685fac.4 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 08:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=u2UNp2OhzC1bMlWx6bjUxKUWRjeCKhT3U/Z3Sb1oqfQ=; b=F9OY+w66q2HcFo8GqP2t6i9rauLSfRlu1C6XKlcRsuhQork9ThIn4GhSfIaECCNdo2 L9OOFryesEFYeTGU/4sibRoiedRFgj8aLlFf1fnndt9fpdgWoznT5FRIC1kr/qjXukCx t5XDE6yysB4Y0M7q/ikyapOnaOwlFCw1QQ4r6r3NEG1z6DSkuRmzI30/RHYBe3XGYldD im6fbvgoUU+nDRXiVFeaHLsgi1uw2v+r1X8PwfZCVp5yrk64/8CGZBFgnGRajAsEK1+F J1zOSCuxA62FqpgF61dDu4snEX8Z7wJC0HY8BH2wqMoNW3byffjs6KBdhM69czMzTeBy VyAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2sRttklu8F3gYaJKQ0W9QBFNupWG5EzuvPflqe1Wsza+kO0TtH QFc0jwmLOo+QcjLMEEsRyrGCHUnol5D30RyZ7SA57XOH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7YRV+mnaw5Ya0SwG8Yh348zQLMXiO6T2MnjSG5tH0ONGQBGdtj3DBmSjv5RaOPeQ7M+M98c/lOdc2ykTEBoGc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:c210:b0:131:e1ab:2cfb with SMTP id z16-20020a056870c21000b00131e1ab2cfbmr3334870oae.244.1664723092410; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 08:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:04:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg4ZVW617hPBaLxHF8jJpm9pq2s66hO2LFr+-f1JAe9MA@mail.gmail.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000092965305ea0e8c2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Eb8dVpnCaQZ7g_Slp7GxiOHgTIs>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 15:04:54 -0000

>
> Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 27 October 2022
>

I am not sure I can survive another three and a half weeks of this thread.

What I have seen from Dan in this thread unfortunately confirms my belief
the PR is required. Note that I said, required, not justified. It would
have been justified a long time ago.

Dan has created a situation where we have to choose between his
contributions and the contributions of the people he would drive away
through his behavior.

If indeed the terminology issue were 'trivial and unimportant' then why
spend so much time sabotaging it?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email