IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-07.txt> (Discovering PREF64 in Router Advertisements) to Proposed Standard - PLC consistency

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Fri, 08 November 2019 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D24120801 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:08:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kTe9CIKdmY0N for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62699120800 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [IPv6:2a02:2121:283:c860:5cf:f858:ab78:eeb1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 413414E11AA8; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:08:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4ED21F1ADC; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:08:14 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BARK15yjER1mtOvGuC1zxPEkOx8++oWfOhon7dJZ--Z_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:08:14 +0100
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <F6120A1A-A5DE-45F9-AD74-AE893540B885@employees.org>
References: <157296542741.4445.12665220429941271779.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e3305598-9db3-a7ef-5c54-9d85bb97e401@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAQ80mxVykDJT1de0qmhcMwtKoffcARu6gwrxf9OSJL5cA@mail.gmail.com> <5dd15779-41ee-29a2-ded7-5743e23902c4@gmail.com> <03e6a389-60a4-e6cd-2f96-e98e1a52f7ac@gmail.com> <CAFU7BARK15yjER1mtOvGuC1zxPEkOx8++oWfOhon7dJZ--Z_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/J0Gw3VXGtsxDhv6kmki-o-9RzJI>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-07.txt> (Discovering PREF64 in Router Advertisements) to Proposed Standard - PLC consistency
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:08:20 -0000

> I'd have no way to know that RFC6275 recommends MaxRtrAdvInterval
> value outside of the allowed range.

As long as you don't support Mobile IP do you care?
And largely no-one supports mobile IP.
Punted to transport.
Like all the other hard problems at the network layer.

O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email