IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 27 October 2022 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D67C14792A for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1NWNqKulG1x for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431F8C1527AC for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id y14so1778060ejd.9 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TCuvmfjEb1AkAPUDMBzPT4O0HaOcFFxFeKKArz7qQHw=; b=jkYhiOdWNwPUOAZFLt91HNTIAp5meqjqVePCO9fZxIfvRrw+mh5zKLxoDdah4J2wK2 1v9TEoWuu56bUdWpg1oe1/cAAiByy06Xm2h3sqSDz3tz04vjNlKw7vgTZRIbHBd1xa/W D2F5fOZGhZE9kCdOe8eF/y5YZAR+PSmc0vSIjDatVrGA6maDuL18JlyHK5SUymECY4Sp fLJEMG8gTtDo/LiT27M7vfRtYC78rBPfKrqF8Sn2rD60RcgciQv+V/q197kgsYFXmZ2M NYufP9WD6NSQmqmVl3nymmqPOulNptp0DBJvaq4pgxjzoQbmU3Ew9eAxc6vTuVvch9dn JjAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TCuvmfjEb1AkAPUDMBzPT4O0HaOcFFxFeKKArz7qQHw=; b=pAsjygeqHGT30ZFT7mFUEV0imxpNFrB2FZBnvMbZl8It7EVOV4RUBCDD1YsMIyIRRI LS4buTZt2/q5b4y7+SvhNbu4cfySJ9dhdSOxR4s/Kdro4TBW2mZFPhRV/zXmP2JMtyYD JCYOzlzgdmku4S3/KtxBE6eI3Oh1d9k9q0922atg52fST1P+P+/lrfE2kgG6H1sg+sFa mSR0qK0w1ODED97g722Pd0p9XF17Gl8eCiC7MpA8e6nnU+lttp/XA/RgqjZWTisTE2iv tvWrXAhkJyoswAV6xk8RgGlxJacEX8NauPiRIJvFGQ18D7iF0KEIScVJ0udNhwcAXlSD Ksxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0yOuZ6QZ0B30SDMi8VkmdCQhjlUE1gHCEmF8P9XaLYVf1C7eeb rMKSiWDZE7t0re+7QZGIJtbokr7bOH+dELJ2eIjGFOaXmQo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6uUDMGHZiRzU6aW1F1WnLi+GuNDJvu2PrVSVM02cax7Gih3HId+7RO3hrUBG9x6wWh5KtCDqG7krOPWjdL9bg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5dae:b0:78e:3109:36d1 with SMTP id n14-20020a1709065dae00b0078e310936d1mr40913304ejv.470.1666852767726; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org> <0d5d01d8e90c$64070290$2c1507b0$@gmail.com> <a5406bce-40b5-b621-64fe-d4ab68ef960c@gmail.com> <000601d8e9c8$c3858c70$4a90a550$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <000601d8e9c8$c3858c70$4a90a550$@gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:39:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyXU=AfY=TS6910dgptLELe21vo3oj4BwWAfXabgcLVMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d00ed05ebfe67c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/JTKtTwbPKHLqUXfjhGEhiYUp68s>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 06:39:34 -0000

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:56 PM Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> My point was that just using sarcasm or satire should not be a foundation
> for the proposed action, since it is just a form (perhaps not the best
> one).


Well, then you didn't read the messages. Some of them are sarcasm or satire
(in a juvenile reddit way), but some are not.

Here is one that is in the IESG message, and addressed to me:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/68a4amMa1aiaRUPzPGgXdiY9gHg/

That is not sarcasm or satire. Somewhere in the area of irony, my
suggestion was to spare our colleagues from messages like the one you just
wrote, although I support the right of anyone to have a blog and write
anything.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email