Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Thu, 06 October 2022 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86437C1524D4 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-JGLruQiAzl for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CE9C157B44 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitty.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0RJC14KILFM4EX@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for last-call@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 13:06:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.153] (kitty.dhcp.bergandi.net [10.0.42.19]) by kitty.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0RJC00939FM31Q@kitty.bergandi.net> for last-call@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net ([98.97.56.194] EXTERNAL) (EHLO [192.168.1.153]) with TLS/SSL by kitty.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.19]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:06:04 -0700
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:06:03 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <5b2ffcb8-9953-f485-e658-fa85b0e34f59@network-heretics.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Message-id: <0d4944b1-b3f6-fd8f-560a-bd5104274d7f@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=kitty.bergandi.net, send-ip=98.97.56.194)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net [98.97.56.194] (EHLO [192.168.1.153])
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org> <DF06E9B6-CCCD-4A90-8E56-DC6C7297D642@apple.com> <1916ee1b-33bc-6180-f4e5-87446c962fc4@kit.edu> <6be2b10d-fd5c-06d7-3a61-9fc0b5ed7259@network-heretics.com> <03438936-c54c-3323-d101-60b59ac77b26@kit.edu> <95bed18d7cad17c1996451772065942ad74c2864.camel@ifi.uio.no> <551e18ab-6d2c-1190-45b3-52132879fd97@kit.edu> <5b2ffcb8-9953-f485-e658-fa85b0e34f59@network-heretics.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [221003a] (kitty.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/K6XPOJxo9XQO9167s6tQNYFpiqY>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:07:19 -0000


On 10/6/22 10:23 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> Of course, humor, including even ridicule, _can be_ a way of diffusing 
> such adverse reactions.   But it requires a lot of skill to be 
> effective, and not everyone can pull it off.   It's very risky.

   Yes and obviously I do not have the skill necessary to pull it off.

   It has also been pointed out to me in a private email that sarcasm
doesn't work very well in an international forum where not everyone
will interpret it the right way. Also, the "check your privilege" kind of
intersectionality I was lampooning is largely a US phenomena and
not everyone is aware of how it works or its excesses so a satirical
description of this would not be understood. I understand this now.

   Dan.

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius