[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-21

[Ines Robles via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-??
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2022-10-04
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04
IESG Telechat date: 2022-10-20

Summary:

This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority (HNA) can
automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and outsource the
authoritative naming service for the home network.

The document is well written and easy to understand.

I have two minor questions as nits.

Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments/Questions:

1- Have you consider in this document RFC 7227- Guidelines for Creating New
DHCPv6 Options -? If yes, should it be added in the references? If not, why
not? 2- Page 9: "The use of DHCPv6 options provides a similar level of trust as
the one used to provide the IP prefix." In which features are similar? In which
features are dissimilar?

Thanks for this document,

Ines.