Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 30 September 2022 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD39C14CF15; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ViaqQetX_-rQ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [46.182.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F426C14F606; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 12:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netability.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A86869CE84; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 20:24:07 +0100 (IST)
To: last-call@ietf.org, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <46d7df8d-f1b5-8ecc-05f2-a590d2074dcf@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 20:24:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.57
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/NSg9EL5dHhiag88JPvYTae2zgSA>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 19:24:15 -0000

IETF Chair wrote on 29/09/2022 17:15:
> Following community feedback after various incidents, as documented below, the
> IESG has initiated a posting rights (PR) action that would restrict the posting
> rights of Dan Harkins, as per the procedures found in BCP 83 (RFC 3683).
> Specifically, his posting privileges to these lists would be suspended:
> 
> * admin-discuss
> * gendispatch
> * ietf
> * terminology

There's been a number of occasions over the last couple of years where 
I've been tempted to unsubscribe from ietf@ due to the degree of toxic 
content posted there by a number of people, one of whom is Dan Harkins. 
I'm not subscribed to these other lists, but a cursory glance suggests 
that they also contain rude, abusive and aggressive content too, 
including from him.

I've read the emails listed in this email, and have also read both 
draft-les-white-intersectional-dots and 
draft-les-white-tls-preferred-pronouns. They display a pattern of 
continuous, unapologetic rudeness and abusiveness towards others.

It's completely possible to professionally disagree with someone else, 
while being polite, respectful or even just being plain civil.  Dan had 
this option open to him at all times for all of his interactions on IETF 
mailing lists.  No-one forced him or anyone else to be either rude or 
abusive.

It's regrettable that there is a need for this action to be proposed, 
but the alternative is to live not just with this toxicity, but with its 
downstream effects: lack of engagement from existing ietf contributors, 
people leaving mailing lists, no new people getting on board, a hostile 
environment for people who are not caucasian male, and a perpetuation + 
acceptance of this hostile environment.

I support the action that was proposed, for the reasons that it was 
proposed.

His email from of 11:53:22 -0700 confirms that this is the least harmful 
course of action in this situation.

Nick