IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 03 December 2020 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51D13A0858; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:19:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=Bdb8EbEo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=pS9Ul0Ey
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhJcslQ429aD; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A89C3A07DB; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAACF3D; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 06:19:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:19:54 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=GsIo gKO7dW3g1CAyEOQIyhd5YvxuAs7v5/AwcZDKl6s=; b=Bdb8EbEoMxhl3S1Obsqy Zjs+zXiMt4X6aoemp1+wgBOLA2WPaeo8onfFJnw3gl7JwM3CD0QBGVKqM+okcZzd S5csXRDXtni8bPOYRMKKH+fuLVE/g/TIhCE0q9eQp1nIVSdzeJSc48Q+9dcmz+/h P1OdCVdZ+ggfgtGqird+AHjB5t2hEde/OtG/B2kiTs8ggONI+mj/63QKTHn/RqXi rE2GBGn81aLa7uf/EUVdx/Daet3aCJY40cyR3OHdHJfF1I966gxr8QG3FJ0RlKRo 3or1qcqw4NnCNX5fOXgIaRvTrnol8fisjl0EATqBorS/i4rlC4xbwjON3PtCxGl6 7Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=GsIogK O7dW3g1CAyEOQIyhd5YvxuAs7v5/AwcZDKl6s=; b=pS9Ul0EyekABNDk1hLtSX3 vc2JoFEuovB8rxm/zZ1FYpSK7TPcSb+R5vJ6tVggaDVpP6Z5caIpQL8Q3wkcje6a ftzBPxzIz4+zhTQFoT/vY8oOGSsSfjvH6XoDivQgCk/ca9bJ1gXPCDEaA/hmI7yF 8axb1dB/kdOiw4qtzkUoOU7QBPOoIsfqkBsSFEisxuOJ627iHrMMHYayiLEZ5xlM br1sVeYECbRYJmIkO8lWf+8JJzAGCwwiwH0PT5tG3yqllW7xXVOr6j1lWIeuhAoV SNSUjR/2yFgBggG3jcb/NR+DRbeB+xREkhNK80eLtERnn/Sbaa0MvmUNXtVtPsYg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2MnIX5xmjT932g1Wav9OVO7Mp1JIrcsdo6-ufnRPzcmeIU4tnlfUXg> <xme:2MnIX5T0KkGc6BWGHDpFpOVujoI3_Y-bVvGmEH69DlHvhLDOyqKtcM9i2S_cGzVnn J0pZutD4Pw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeiiedgvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhho nhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehteegfeevteduffevteehfffghefhvdevkeeuhfeh ueetudehgfegieekjeetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2MnIXzVz1x5vsJIC--54k2OKvKncPzn6aY_sE0xqVtdIWI4HuxvPOQ> <xmx:2MnIX7gX_SKDTTVt7gL26RoRvot821WYhJ8mgEHLx0qD-FdpQ3Yf_w> <xmx:2MnIX7At9vIk3K1d0dLSHhFKcbYv6IOAfznvQDCb-XPJqVI5qqaQkw> <xmx:2cnIXyOctTb4OCqTc6dl6sI1rW8sYKLWCtn5P9DP8cxWaeVD5Bvr2w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BBFEF180117; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 06:19:52 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b9b4b82e-954d-4f63-94c2-44004bf0637b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+fLM42_edbkNx87MgYwqCM84WVQ9QBKe7NCT5nZhT0Sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <160680275991.19519.15021073145558109806@ietfa.amsl.com> <04396f38-431b-48e8-8b0f-65e2518d8ed4@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CALaySJ+fLM42_edbkNx87MgYwqCM84WVQ9QBKe7NCT5nZhT0Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 22:19:20 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid.all@ietf.org, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="778cf0e65b804d7981954baaa590af9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Os44yhhQlYtupYqoc3m8mM0P5ek>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:20:04 -0000

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, at 02:18, Barry Leiba wrote:
> > And yeah - if the latest mmark is causing artifacts I'll see what I can do about those.  I admit I didn't
> > read through the whole thing in detail again after making the last updates.
> 
> If it's easy to fix, please do, but don't get too wrapped up in
> spending time on that: the RFC Editor will be converting it to xml2rfc
> v3 anyway, and those issues will be resolved in that process.

Thanks Barry, it was really this simple:

-For servers which also support [!@RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes,
+For servers which also support [@!RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes,

Yep, I did feel rather silly.  My workflow already spits out xml2rfc v3 files, so hopefully that saves the RFC editor some work :)

I've uploaded -06 with those two fixes, since I haven't seen any other feedback yet.

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email