Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Tue, 25 October 2022 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A9BC1524BE; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGs71oINbJhj; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC912C1522C5; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw00.schlund.de ([10.72.76.56]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeehE-1pQb3R1nvq-00qQtK; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:51:51 +0200
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:51:49 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "lloydwood@users.sourceforge.net" <lloydwood@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1659579803.1584473.1666713109917@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <6e5f41b7-98af-5ba0-dc73-f0b9125fac1e@nohats.ca>
References: <850616311.908536.1666656130433@email.ionos.com> <963D4B7F-DCF4-41F0-9819-D079C607818D@yahoo.co.uk> <6e5f41b7-98af-5ba0-dc73-f0b9125fac1e@nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev29
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:81me0AOw01Ybm+MVTHEFviQZ5P1/P/H/jZqBolFbTrL9JGm+OBh TDEA07JYNSB8NoyyEjpGPIa6c4m57+s12qm9SF306iA9YnEI73NnORR7dioczVwwQhJB1uH N7f/bPv67OLgqVQagvjYwdK3qlpyiSJK44EfRQoTUXWl5hqTWt3r3F51Xoud5S4rNAhFXSS zBJFc1k9g2OMjLSGGtymw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:kzUc+uBa5jU=:J25QLG2MmmYBg7AH3YS34O /jGpwmMA4B6gww+2vDd5iKwzddxHJc5O4xUn0+SePdzZCkpEo6ukYLgxOD/ktRJFPOx2KW3XQ fi38DApDqWlrSotBluZ+UmJuKTIzpTREofrRMnX4y5vagsD9v+WLtk3ONHMd5EQ4AWQszEq6F Zm+mWT4kczgyW1dzBlQmkAEdvcCVlM0sFuXP9/aSCCfiKixf+3+qoDXmksJ2riJktCyozqZcC job8hO3LlH/jrpzk63nv2qn/oSDG0OaJUD4Vto76A35aTZVpaJIFxSzijkvqra7BRX7vYul+Y ++yivZG+SIMfRbGnaYroK9f5Qvc17/9ryyyPZ/2GYRj0f4dCOMR/aTHvWihBE/mgGwYgusNta TMUwntXmy86g0HG5s0M9RlPd7yx4KUKJVgh/bcQaaQUeg27CIkmr37RF92/C6RQ358pGhKDbw YtPmxUcIa/LO2wkJm47X3WhlYpl0NWyrPD5348Ru30Oas5xcIpAo9meSkSZ+JLS0w6QxXVBpB K7n7eHvErk//yACfkokoX/zfKT9pPd+OaMgZrncL1rGOP8Cn4g5nhmBdJA7nKASDxOMm6dd3G iOju33UBZQuklGzZZsicJ9Ee/1oYE/6szbpmcgFdPyZitvvfpAR9TunkXW/MCDB9FfnEgbBdX 3aKeKPcvv52KtfW4W7szgIziqFRgp4XR5mOrAoKzRoCGk8ZCPuIU4wE2w2uw7Nh4a5oUdm7va DaN16cjK8jcxnmMr5ZDfn0lik/VIrQ3F2UjwicI1C/bSwRFT4W8FDm5orZQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/UP7kNpleMnDGxbuQcc2FbEa_yOo>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:52:16 -0000

> On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
>  
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:
> 
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
> > interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
> > suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.
> 
> It is a mistake that we will correct.
> 


Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an alternative name.  How about Master-list?