IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 15 March 2022 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E660C3A1077 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XO-UKBubQoZx for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D273A170E for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id m187so1914820vsc.12 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iCiTdab/LM6WZlPc/+7HXNaZKn8gaPqwJhZy7va9LIY=; b=efSso8iy86PTZpN8VXvlWrofGMzsl340M9LE7aTeLQuPL6R+rFDfbmVE/mmexmDFcG lhiQP/VOykdNiyDYc5FrRViRCXZ7rex4CJVKQUmECBzYk3q9oDT+mfiImlur0Ktgse02 AS/5t7eiF76PGan5irQP4TLSeDIenMxdkFtSYKEFdfA86UgUeFVwFUr6GVKcauSlLvi6 V7f9HZh45665eghAnf6z+TE42DJ1+uusY9WlpNWaHma0U6IoxGavuveOBZhMM1+/xHsT fH2UEqi9cU50PLzbBKDHyM0Lg+BgeiiH2JLW46SDIhWtnm9y8qa2FOCSf0GPrOslhzsf Bt1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iCiTdab/LM6WZlPc/+7HXNaZKn8gaPqwJhZy7va9LIY=; b=iJYEgAEOPVH8i9W/zsUDhJ56vJkXyJGl6I5EF7yO9lDdyiVH1yi3U9ixOCbPiXgEKi b5NGRHrhMPqXT9IalisYDJGn3Z/qcaXQYTaPlVWf1VpWdDpVMKwT15cxhBlQvjy/gByx 7MQUoVd2LJpMMj82+MVMVNpgkEPWM9yRl9Iwzx6yqxD2datgDkDhW0X6uXxdja3Fjdvw G1fU5MF0OD+i6iDO5L63OUhzwT/cId2qUyJml7cgnKjhoAwkK3ya9k1ulBjE7x8iyyVw JUzF9I/3nvD26RudXNjh1vVm/FlQW9lXVE6FhvEcImSAWkFzjBOUv5Cyp+7LEamV6iTC tvHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f+aZccwzHofUXxRwLsNAcz5Q8FVxEwgjseEWesQeURintGjmD a/59zC+2SgQ9cLN49oyMOzRLgFEO1TmDjYjHbIQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxODCGoyF4zi5IwxOFVxplCvK5sYrhT8bNMzdmpE6sGTNrQBP+Csv5aIg6uWnEDxRe4q9zo5u7NQzCTO+R3/eA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e442:0:b0:322:bfc2:e4f6 with SMTP id n2-20020a67e442000000b00322bfc2e4f6mr7653813vsm.0.1647363146610; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220228222932.825F33844270@ary.qy> <245C65D2-EC38-4C49-9CA0-3DD687CB37DA@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMAnmoJ0n3mPscZvc6kbyOZjQU78vb+iA0Pw5Qq=_kKZEw@mail.gmail.com> <ee8c0615-9207-cf7a-b1a0-905f33062e7a@taugh.com> <CA+9kkMBn-jJbwKjOdOpLL3PFS0REVUBUoSa+2MD0NxnvttHCcg@mail.gmail.com> <91329874-9301-40EC-8155-FBFE55DB89E4@akamai.com> <618c8f70-3d09-fe09-6088-597b2b63655e@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <3efab652-be64-e179-b387-0468a2da9f1c@taugh.com> <5DCC145C-D887-4184-B8F5-3C00563C620A@akamai.com> <7672C0CA-DED8-45A4-842A-BC5C159DD792@greenhills.co.uk> <CADTQi=ekZ-0ChcJ2F-WTxCRvGRSuPOyygbBuRkDpO39mq0Hykw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADTQi=ekZ-0ChcJ2F-WTxCRvGRSuPOyygbBuRkDpO39mq0Hykw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:52:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa54t0P_ZniVHvMnee1j9g0Rb6j7Rj9LMCUPwPeOEVrcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gary Illyes <garyillyes=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Martijn Koster <m.koster@greenhills.co.uk>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "henner@google.com" <henner@google.com>, "lizzi@google.com" <lizzi@google.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b7c0e05da449fc4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XKg193DgMr5kqKYARbDhdhsnW4g>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:53:15 -0000

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:05 PM Gary Illyes <garyillyes=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> With all that said, it's clear that the current boilerplate is a no-go
> and, based on some sidebar chats, our worries perhaps unfounded,
> so we can switch the status section to the "IETF Informational w/
> consensus" one
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/status-memos.txt).
>
> Additionally, addressing Mark's comment about an ACK from other
> consumers of the REP, I'll put out a public request on an official
> Google social media account inviting other search engines to reply
> here. We did check in with them before submitting the draft as well
> as when we made notable changes (v5 -> v6), but I agree that the
> other consumers of the REP should also at least acknowledge the
> publication of this draft, considering how important it is in general.
>

If the authors are prepared to make this change, I'd like to hear why "IETF
Standards Track w/consensus" is (or should be) off the table, especially if
other search engines are going to indicate support.

-MSK

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email