IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 08 March 2022 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF223A0F0A for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2JWNiJlaoiv for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E643A060D for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 228Gk7El013647; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:38:43 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=kT8N4mrQ6pbms1C6+tzWvd62xHZ+S9WsGlGOYONCDXk=; b=VwSyPj3T/YiZuCnn5cXjDM5POtN08dx241or4PmC74FzL4T0yAMU9TkNi0V0F1scA4Qm 1E1YW3gn6Guh3Cg3u6s69nXqLa9gsYxTBUmUXBadx9UQfuzeue+izb6zyMp5zt1Of0ae um2cac/3mf7ja7XwXJbMPnlbiSYrhx1AxbPfY2ssb7aJj7L+M2kLXLjCQUyaoRQJs2P7 MGHiKjA8gKb1GV4ayPdx4EB6QrgYgWio4lKoNvkLdxw4jZcbm5CC0hcdt0Pxej2Ww5dO FY5Z3OedUDeBmTqLStkVrI0B74VZXueXGXmVCEfM1p9dNd0a7qqK8L2hkr3vfVsr8Gwt ew==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3enqen4rdf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 17:38:43 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 228HSO4e010851; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:38:42 -0800
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.22]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3em6qewhun-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:38:42 -0800
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) by usma1ex-dag4mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.922.20; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:38:42 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.28; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:38:41 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.028; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 11:38:41 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AQHYLMpSOJX633bVn0a2FFfHU631eqyppBYAgABMOACAAAcuAIALrnoAgACAvwCAAAmigP//rYiA
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:38:40 +0000
Message-ID: <91329874-9301-40EC-8155-FBFE55DB89E4@akamai.com>
References: <20220228222932.825F33844270@ary.qy> <245C65D2-EC38-4C49-9CA0-3DD687CB37DA@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMAnmoJ0n3mPscZvc6kbyOZjQU78vb+iA0Pw5Qq=_kKZEw@mail.gmail.com> <ee8c0615-9207-cf7a-b1a0-905f33062e7a@taugh.com> <CA+9kkMBn-jJbwKjOdOpLL3PFS0REVUBUoSa+2MD0NxnvttHCcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBn-jJbwKjOdOpLL3PFS0REVUBUoSa+2MD0NxnvttHCcg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22030601
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_91329874930140EC8155FBFE55DB89E4akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.816 definitions=2022-03-08_07:2022-03-03, 2022-03-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=917 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203080090
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: jAwknBesiqxkJwtshBWddBELCU2-C5kw
X-Proofpoint-GUID: jAwknBesiqxkJwtshBWddBELCU2-C5kw
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-08_07,2022-03-04_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=918 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203080091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XNdDtavBEjVpPHQWm6NaHgOwrBo>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 17:38:52 -0000

Can someone – probably one of the authors, not Ted – why they feel it is necessary to not allow derivative works?

In the past there have been many RFC’s that documented existing cryptographic algorithms: Blake2, ChaCha/Poly, etc. None of them say no derivatives.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email