Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-10

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Wed, 25 May 2022 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB150C16A144 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMfAiKNymkkQ for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6CBC16551E for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id e2so17973117wrc.1 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=h0x1zCs66xnpAoqNaqXAPBweuqaMuaH0JkQeCp9cUG0=; b=kzO+d9GljUV4jhf2vhYXWMJgN0/5bnlud/ZVj8nQiIh0D6Fuq9TJ8xR4uGKFWOaKGR doArFX0qFMT844vuRhNvqwoNMw69AoNbVef4m6vaOItBlUkqTWv6LNP2IzndyetnzLVN 3SC+DF6bE33XkNrK5rnLBnYreUSRLUUjzTX7WAR6T2dJGH3TSj82HPtnCmLtFtTyebDh F/M3mJSquuyystc/6l5SZ0R9R9TpDUkY9r/JgdjBujjQi3c+C13xTPLBCc4iuTht6wDp 2LuPAXD1EWXAqSNImESL9hJDqmTkF+D95fvW7Apj6TtExG+5IJM407hZNRQBmduiOVKP 5vpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=h0x1zCs66xnpAoqNaqXAPBweuqaMuaH0JkQeCp9cUG0=; b=FwgSHofb8FAkOwrnr7mCJkCgTuR2P0MWCP6MYACam9QunQvExMuC8RiDMYd3+SoD53 Rsquo1G3vwHKrPCgHDIOD94eGSNIglO+xkjejMZP+j21wTTW64rvtTh0+oQCbJMHdN3M qnimAUqM3TW+WEn4uKbDF6tUy9+Y1JAHYydZPuCafLfLLs09Z7DpSdnWYHe6O8V1cAco 0WJZLDb3UoE0i7btdVpoeN2BjkE+8I2NdhwkJXSZK+o6UuxuY9dLUKgaPD21I+pdlZ5b jXmZU5UPr8EZP4E96dxFa27zHA9aDX2ns6lZJhJighTTLdpRiR2Lt3rntw+9j/yQvfZ+ CWnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jfFNvCRFIgVH0P14Senvfh1IAz+wlIo6wZGAQG3gFi4eYTgq6 S9SS3GU62CclDiGLFLhqYFcGuw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAuexCA3bedwWQO0EHZ6adZbp3xYf1w+DhGt3JvSDXm1xuyzAiD4zaixc3HSxTHv2D/fwr5A==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:620c:0:b0:20c:f50a:dafa with SMTP id y12-20020a5d620c000000b0020cf50adafamr27349050wru.460.1653476201382; Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([37.172.56.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15-20020a7bc74f000000b003972c672859sm1532708wmk.21.2022.05.25.03.56.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 May 2022 03:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <B1BF7A57-0BA3-4451-8C9D-B143918E9C9F@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_067E63D1-9713-41CD-8E2D-AA2940945C32"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 12:56:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAAK044TrqmZ7yW83XASR1A6F-2738VQf3ROYfPFz6KD_eUNDWg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis.all@ietf.org, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <165277573465.63464.14494815453477247059@ietfa.amsl.com> <B9C672C4-8B95-4025-9CC7-00F261A76CF8@gigix.net> <CAAK044TrqmZ7yW83XASR1A6F-2738VQf3ROYfPFz6KD_eUNDWg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Ys0Qz87QAmo3A299HXaMYbpF69E>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-10
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:56:48 -0000

HI Yoshifumi,

Two replies:



> On 23 May 2022, at 11:06, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>   * Are we allowed to send a new Map-Register message while waiting for
>>     another Map-Register message?
> 
> Map-registers and related operation are defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis/>.
> This document does not modify its functioning. 
> 
> Got it. It might be good if you could mention it in the draft.
>  

Yes, we will add this clarification.

> 
>> 4: Page 6 Section 6:
>>   I am wondering what is the use case for comparing two version numbers.
>>   I might miss something, but it seems to me that we just need to check
>>   whether the version number is the expected one or not.
>>   It might be better to explain the use case for it if there is any.
> 
> That is explained in detail in Section 7. We will add an forward reference to that section.
> 
> Got it. I am thinking that it might be better to explain in which situations you might receive old version numbers or newer version numbers with a gap bigger than 1.

Yes, we can add such clarification.

Thanks

Luigi




> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi