IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teep-architecture-18

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 September 2022 06:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EE0C14CEFC; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hjwSezmK12xK; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92b.google.com (mail-ua1-x92b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9595C14F746; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92b.google.com with SMTP id u14so3872664ual.3; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 23:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+Vdf/OW2Radpqex0HzTBWeqsTNBp04RzMHBeXODQoAc=; b=p+typtr6muKHP86mmN99psXDgmqgoN8imrEuobobb8dLmirlQIzcsnMK9CuOceOwmR zj8hbzXgGwItYRn+Dti3Y/UhgHggdlR7GhBARcHY+5JFBxkLbPUDNEWR1vipklJECfP9 Sqr/SosrOEyV82DIX5XcJSOmAhZ4qte0XTuKIH1GJT6Hb1sYooYet+ZXWn9SxQqAEfpa 3ZBZZ1hkoHuEPpyj7n/jUfsrdR2kB6HNIZCojH43FMfmQF0CMTTmjKwgiUHb3ncM8E5p V8WzpS/KHn6MlvqK1BBq9jRHEy5+L3WNbwA85BLm5b5Luqgg45cpXKpK9KmQJ5BkmkOz Z+CA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+Vdf/OW2Radpqex0HzTBWeqsTNBp04RzMHBeXODQoAc=; b=PkAntomeOAqsE9rH2cwrEzKUkd9WnMkCG9B2uFJg1qqrZNLYtduKkn7FJQyKyYgHeO mnJaJQ7fxOSrLy3/TkKAthKKoKW4NoW/scmj90s8dnZltYKkjuaJpXAlZEa5/sRC522D 9nM8C6FF0DMNZSDKYPR17zfB/FVbF9m81B2R08KlZg4ybdq3f3hqF4NREleJjo0hnjV7 s6yAT2ImLCFpy4tGk0YumG9bwQRcxrW/nAjYlLvF660fJFawjBH7HBknknyEJUT1PX0n JU3XBS8ayQtmIhawYxgfbstlFfjay5ZplXdRCbzcJTgefcxQCF5NQEJHTyFh+S8vAZck ppnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo37171smqpfKOxngQqMcSj8AtWPA5t0EcxkKViQZLNKAR7LdKrO 4KEPAMMgndFPnAHCk2xlarLJf5bs30KxwWS0m0o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR57hxptz193JWBNzi60OgpWe7PJLWE26yWS7ummWrtQnH1BVmJIeh9bi+W71SddMRV604lTCyyxNyLDiCNiDIo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6130:114:b0:39f:9e87:c373 with SMTP id h20-20020a056130011400b0039f9e87c373mr2620493uag.120.1662618137756; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 23:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166232366878.39571.10095332984770250612@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166232366878.39571.10095332984770250612@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 23:22:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriXusNB3F0_+jE1u8dg_hKHsQ42npG5H1LrHBfSghKO1hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Cc: iot-directorate@ietf.org, draft-ietf-teep-architecture.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teep@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f870005e82473c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/YtEH1cvnEtLlkArmv2dkEj4wWQg>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teep-architecture-18
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 06:22:21 -0000

Ines,

Thank you very much for the review!

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 1:35 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready
>
> IoT Review of draft-ietf-teep-architecture
>
> Summary:
>
> This document depicts a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) architecture
> stating that any code within that environment cannot be tampered with, and
> that
> any data used by such code cannot be read or tampered with by any code
> outside
> that environment; describing a protocol for managing the lifecycle of
> trusted
> applications running inside such a TEE.
>
> Major Issues: Not found
>
> Minor Issues: Not found
>
> Nits/Questions/Comments:
>
> * Pag 9 - Figure 1: The arrows in the diagram are unidirectional, Are there
> cases where it could be bidirectional: e.g. the communication of the Agent
> with
> the Broker?
>
> * Having an IoT scenario, in your opinion which type of Classes of
> Constrained
> Devices (Class 0, Class 1, etc. [RFC7228]) can participate in the TEE as a
> "Device" in Figure 1.
>
> * Page 27: "...In some use cases it may be sufficient to identify only the
> class of the device..." what do you mean with class of device? Perphaps
> would
> be nice to add between brakets some examples.
>
> Thanks for this document,
>
> Ines.
>
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email