Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

"Card, Stu" <stu.card@axenterprize.com> Tue, 25 October 2022 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46361C14F728 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=axenterprize.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9HjslP9BMe2 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB636C14CF0D for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id bp15so23890322lfb.13 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axenterprize.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1+5LbsRX2Enrtdn7hpMLLO/i1KwTe7qd460mKm6Xc70=; b=FlTBfMhnsF4M1ApFCEh1ZshUQm3XhofFAilSCG0fnhux7iU06iqdx13yBbZPgHpAfp lGyTxJKmbZKWmzAnu+CzRX9/EmZFZMTMgjZZY+P0DGUl3kxAsemKQh/7nZHIGabBMLY0 eCLkYbJ8xYQov3KpcKwjGI6pSIyhGa8ry0XdM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1+5LbsRX2Enrtdn7hpMLLO/i1KwTe7qd460mKm6Xc70=; b=m8QiECIQO1qM8w7bKOcoFrbkhmqGwRkoTZkSaHM6Xgkf05PxcgG1FPvon0sgrYUsox esh8WXzisnem8S42BomOq+tdDPQ8swbc8hCO+3NSJUaSbZZQMe8pW1GWAQvkPPFWyoJN GkXXh8Ju+dHbulg5VRNzTVoxhTt2XBy1w8b6LnXWveomAsOcLtjbRp6kJG4VqS5bUwct HSu2s2hlR/ynEHJpRd07TGtLLRzKp50Np0SKBbOM6XOXAVwNJHATbvYrQx3x6+peSrHR VpKhqMviVL01MQvCl2Y0mE7fPoMHevJ9RKxbqTNVmGrKwYNb7d21DMfrFO8FthT5n3Mh xNPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1njjNIhPUjIiDDEc89yehYhZi7MKWTYVE4LpC/1BWRQTzVCxn1 8tG0wTCzLed09ZvMSSXvjehNuaNxSf99sKcAUJlDPjsm2IZPGw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4I88Fr50/xPd02DB034dGY8VaY35sbr+/7oNJjKPAfURdmnA08xd3zNQp+nlZzcVtCs4HxJen0BpqLhu9AKTs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:36d4:b0:4a4:213d:e840 with SMTP id e20-20020a05651236d400b004a4213de840mr15941660lfs.293.1666724607665; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1659579803.1584473.1666713109917@email.ionos.com> <5C89E6B9-02CC-4318-A6B3-BCEC64B3A8E1@nohats.ca> <596056806.1631161.1666718953582@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <596056806.1631161.1666718953582@email.ionos.com>
From: "Card, Stu" <stu.card@axenterprize.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:03:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKM0pYOfJeUpXLQoJw+qCL6eoMPRfcdjCqHxrN5=eHc8fqiktQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Cc: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002dc6ef05ebe0907c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/_rD4DEoikVjCSFUbRYCgUXnqhkM>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:03:34 -0000

It is obvious that we have very divergent thoughts & feelings in this broad
topic area, which in any event is not in the technical area of competence
of IETF.

So, in the interests of technical progress & personal emotional calm,
perhaps the one side can stop shoving sticks into the beehive & the other
can stop assuming that the current majority voiced view is held by all
rational good persons.

WRT the narrower "last call" question, I do not see evidence of consensus.


On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 13:29 Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:

>
> > On 10/25/2022 1:07 PM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:05, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > >> On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
> > >>> interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and
> the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
> > >>> suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the
> IETF.
> > >>
> > >> It is a mistake that we will correct.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an
> alternative name.  How about Master-list?
> >
> > I consider this email inappropriate and unprofessional. It was a follow
> up to another one of your emails that as similarly inappropriate and
> unprofessional.
> >
> > Additionally, you keep misusing the last-call list for off-topic
> messages.
> >
> > I ask that the moderators evaluate these messages.
> >
> > Paul
>
>
> It's on topic, relax.  No need to try and make me the next BCP83 victim.
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>