Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]

Keith Moore <> Mon, 03 October 2022 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC30CC1524DF for <>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.608
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkUtnHM2sD0e for <>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D698FC1524D6 for <>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal []) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47F432002E8; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:08:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Oct 2022 14:08:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1664820519; x= 1664906919; bh=Sx28SHcxoLTs2KqC6MnvJ/mhhkfAdfGap/CRw+4yEBs=; b=s kwUr24IOo0VawfKUCdCyKmqcKne4SlHDJa0hw/Uu28wg++Qx1aBF4W5xGOMlHjcA riZXShXpp4YwCJRtm1FW6oS3+hRs71SFKhWLpNLBJ3VhExR6tO8Bu7E/ezO03fDo Pd1FdnuQoXmW8zihxCSp5ICky2bXinViED36f8pKRUF8vvZsjkz7T76ywHfNtHGy 4UxSqjHMGG6Ai+R/UIp3bwMDS84RS/YO/pJNpMVB9SUqee7cWWrA6nssb39Vdazh dmZZfL7+mkPobXgpHiC23Y7H2jHiKDGcv9UrsJVOx5Cx0BgJBuJUpM6mLFMBTb2V UWNVOLBvZ24YXl5rZX89w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JyU7Y93KwV-qzyyYRk8Ip07BrkkZX_yzVE0DmsSqrcOvmaxsUF5iAQ> <xme:JyU7Y0EKeNOuX7gE4v7h0mzkvRsez9OKnqcQGZKx7vYOKYdtrHVtfFi6v6nuoBMGE 38WCkY8R4QqUA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:JyU7Y94bn6xBDUVJqFWV5d5O_yNNP_rDOGrMjCRVSZYhto8UxziRBAKkjmVj-uajxo7XHQf2BAMvOhRoeB-8rz34ZV5bTEjI7j4MU1dshcB-0V5LWhH1Mw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeehledguddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgse htkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgv thifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuvdehhe etfeduueejtdeludeigfevgffgudevveekuddvheevveegkeffvdejvdenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfi horhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JyU7Y629U-yocwBUjwrW8xeSdY2pElEkQozH4RtAFIqpkXiZRCjcdg> <xmx:JyU7YwH10Pk2EFykf1XGHVo3LirNbde_KmzVB7rw-0sc1QpeISOYWg> <xmx:JyU7Y7_T6VVPi95znNWz4doazbt33eT9UscweryVfmyo_v4NH2_nwA> <xmx:JyU7YzzkABuh6EcNjyDiia4Mzwj6DheBqCGbR07Twz61qBrvQPkpHA>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 14:08:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Keith Moore <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 18:08:45 -0000

On 10/3/22 10:48, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> I question the characterization of the raw materials under 
> consideration here as mere "varying opinions".  The target of the PR 
> action has proudly stated that his tactics involve the use of 
> ridicule.  I prefer the term "polemics", but either way, it's not as 
> simple as a difference of opinion.
I haven't seen that statement, and can't really judge it without seeing 
it.    I guess I think that ridicule can serve a useful purpose in 
constructive dialog, but is more likely than not to be counterproductive.

But I don't think it's fair to judge such statements in the abstract, 
and it's better to judge the actual statements made, while attempting to 
understand the context in which those statements were made.