[Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08
Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 29 November 2022 04:32 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99F4C14CF0B; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:32:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-raw-use-cases.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, raw@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166969633175.1497.7774961298697616216@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <sureshk@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:32:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/fLf-l1wsMDqdK8Oi4ABdy9WlC6Y>
Subject: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:32:11 -0000
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Issues Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready with Nits I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-raw-use-cases. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot a NO OBJECTION on this document. The document is well written and easy to understand. There are a few minor issues I found that you may wish to address. Minor issues: * Section 1 The following text looks a bit out of date since 5G has already been deployed for quite some time. "* IMT-2020 has recognized Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) as a key functionality for the upcoming 5G." It probably needs to be rewritten. * Section 2 I know the developments are fairly new but have you considered how LEO satellite technology affects this area? * Section 4.3 Would it be useful to refer to RFC9030 in addition to RFC7554 to point to related IETF work?
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-i… CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO