[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-tls-32
Sarah Banks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 16 November 2020 16:47 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21673A12A8; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:47:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sarah Banks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: quic@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-quic-tls.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.22.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160554525274.11282.16513170010870102745@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 08:47:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/fYVWLZh63RiICQU6VxMjBydNWU0>
Subject: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-tls-32
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:47:33 -0000
Reviewer: Sarah Banks Review result: Ready Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Status: Ready for publication Overall, I found this to be a very well written document. For a doc that tracks at ~65 pages, I couldn't find any critiques, short of editorial nits here and there. It reads as "thoughtful", and as if it's had the many reviews and eyeballs on it as it seems to have had. I also appreciated the feedback and advice regarding performance. A big thank you to the authors, the WG, and the reviewers who pitched in; your effort shows. Thanks Sarah
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Sarah Banks via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Lars Eggert