Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 25 October 2022 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AC5C1522AA; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nk3X1WKH7WNP; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915AAC14F606; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MxXwF29HSz1vX; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:34:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1666704845; bh=NpTltXlHWL6HZwetjcljJcb/tDPyc8thGjvuoE5U+PE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=J5YInBpd+o+6bTGZlgXAj7MPtgqQOHKetmtgiBvGkAPwHHFLnPWVaahPrCRymkwUy n4YV8vQY7v+f23r2vQ5py6gPz+hFD7ydq9JncgsOrR8LJQ2G9R3u5BO2Q0RLxbWpi+ Y9eOtWXaJOLOff8jybtw/ro7B+/jHC/Q2FcUKFbU=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1u30EmBKrQQb; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:34:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:34:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EAC793FC47C; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E788B3FC47B; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:34:02 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: last-call@ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <963D4B7F-DCF4-41F0-9819-D079C607818D@yahoo.co.uk>
Message-ID: <6e5f41b7-98af-5ba0-dc73-f0b9125fac1e@nohats.ca>
References: <850616311.908536.1666656130433@email.ionos.com> <963D4B7F-DCF4-41F0-9819-D079C607818D@yahoo.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/foMijqimFejykVGOSEmdL7vKaoE>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:34:12 -0000

On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
> interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
> suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.

It is a mistake that we will correct.

> How is this list used?

This is the feature that if you are subscribed to any 1 IETF list, you
can post to all other IETF lists without being subscribed.

Paul
(redirecting reply-to: to ietf@ as it has nothing to do with any last-call)