IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Wed, 26 October 2022 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B38CC1522C3 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDr-_Vft2AZS for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sea.shrubbery.net (sea.shrubbery.net [129.250.47.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F693C14CE33 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sea.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 9CB1638DD45; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 21:25:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 21:25:17 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Y1mlvbVVz+Pxif3R@shrubbery.net>
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org> <0d5d01d8e90c$64070290$2c1507b0$@gmail.com> <a5406bce-40b5-b621-64fe-d4ab68ef960c@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a5406bce-40b5-b621-64fe-d4ab68ef960c@gmail.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/hVTPANdZCYR-aXpiXbxzN0MiH4A>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 21:25:20 -0000

Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 08:46:14AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter:
> Valery,
> 
> I'm not commenting further on the PR action as such. We are a diverse group of people and many here are not native speakers of the language. I suggest that using sarcasm or satire in this group is an ineffective and confusing method. If half the audience takes the sarcasm or the satire seriously, the argument will cancel itself out.
> 
> Regards
>     Brian Carpenter

Is sarcasm against the rules and grounds for censorship?  Is humor also
impermissible?  Top-posting/replying should certainly be.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email