[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01
Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 22 October 2022 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5538FC14CE2D; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.18.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166645425833.26169.5634491633400829814@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:57:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/kl-Q3iiVwChuvDPVaGTHs6v1gdI>
Subject: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:57:38 -0000
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2022-10-22 IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Generally a well written document that is ready to go. However, I have a concern about whether SHOULD is strong enough in terms of explaining the reason to deny an allocation request. Then a question of IETF policy on use if RFC 2119 language and a possible typo. All of this is easily addressed. Major issues: Denials SHOULD include an explanation and, if SB> For transparency and due diligence surely denials MUST include an explanation? Minor issues: SB> I am not sure that RFC2119 language is applicable to the human action it is applied to in this text. Nits/editorial comments: 3. Designated Expert Pool Expert Review [RFC8126] registry requests are registered after a three-week review period on the <ssh-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list, on the advice of one or more designated experts. However, to SB> list, and on…?
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-yee-… Stewart Bryant via Datatracker