Re: [Last-Call] [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-19.txt> (DHCPv6 Options for Home Network Naming Authority) to Proposed Standard

Yes, removing entire sentence is what I had in mind.

- Bernie Volz

> On Sep 20, 2022, at 9:51 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks for the feedback Bernie, the sentence mentioning the reference is the one below in the security consideration. 
> 
> The link between the HNA and the DHCPv6 server may benefit from additional security for example by using {{?I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6}}.
> 
> I think the example was illustrative on how the link security can be improved. Now I also agree that referring a dead idea is not so ideal. My questions are: do we have more valuable examples to cite and if not 2) don't you think we should remove the sentence completely ? - I suspect simply removing the reference creates a sort of Lapalissade.
> 
> Yours, 
> Daniel 
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:50 PM Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi:
>> 
>> I would highly recommend dropping the text/reference to:
>> 
>> [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6]
>>               Li, L., Jiang, S., Cui, Y., Jinmei, T., Lemon, T., and D.
>>               Zhang, "Secure DHCPv6", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
>>               draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-21, 21 February 2017,
>>               <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dhc-
>>               sedhcpv6-21.txt>.
>> 
>> As that work was long ago abandoned by the DHC wg and it serves no purpose to reference dead work.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> - Bernie Volz
>> 
>>> On 20/09/2022, 17:43, "iesg-secretary@ietf.org on behalf of The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    The IESG has received a request from the Home Networking WG (homenet) to
>>>    consider the following document: - 'DHCPv6 Options for Home Network Naming
>>>    Authority'
>>>      <draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-19.txt> as Proposed
>>>      Standard
>>> 
>>>    The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>>>    comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>>>    last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2022-10-04. Exceptionally, comments may
>>>    be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
>>>    of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>> 
>>>    Abstract
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority
>>>       (HNA) can automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and
>>>       outsource the authoritative naming service for the home network.  In
>>>       most cases, the outsourcing mechanism is transparent for the end
>>>       user.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    The file can be obtained via
>>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dhcwg mailing list
>>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson