IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Mon, 26 September 2022 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4759EC14F743; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbnpuXB9tLPt; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8636C14F73B; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id rk17so3279605ejb.1; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=LSKYlLFwPmgWt9oIH3H06gidZuzb/+StLC9Jvxf7tik=; b=mizUcSV9Ls8o4HH6hgT6Efwehj/w647BjgvpMF21IEVhtqoMyahJPhAEG2+akVvw1R 8hzHaW2jkHsf8mIxmfngDI7RlKaEms5jgSvJu18bt4v1/FF1tATQsOmCM53gnkr4C5sA SSsCC85O5ILgPRpcyOPV5rM2B90rs0Aq6tRjNVr8A0+Lw84Di6AsSJuOTDyKjQZ+pu4C RFdjTUrlzPkzgOs0I7KQWSVI1tuOVLEC1k24r+pXQK1yCEHiYhfwl3Rk9hVBjhoxDbTA aij/ewahkxpuSalKrwOGc61XZdp/ycFeOWQRDKEJ7gs/iSc7iWlw2h9IYUxWst2DirmZ /rSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=LSKYlLFwPmgWt9oIH3H06gidZuzb/+StLC9Jvxf7tik=; b=IT2hKOGp5MEXUWMOlbevlJtYpq9S2ty5STeDqItpkRucWovD3ZSNQy78ubsPxOfTAn a0u9r4VDQ9HwpAq7R9tEBgkiHuJF9fWNqw8QY+Hv/Nz+081iUqalLCY1q1CLgblyOG2B nVxPT7PQSpPhW/joqxc9UxgeNp7KNyqMWlwpH6prJnv3v4XPbMpf+LoOhiIhm2XBpV4g 9JO8Ii07X7UHQrgsXHzWxVGXIcSIqnhu3g1PlPutgAKVGfaU2i4Oxvm+7FGncpEJP1ir TWJjr38bxHg/Da5ioqK/CEt2xXiKXNjkLqhdQ+YXcqIHfd38tajvebI1xr4x2BliqWeg Qk8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2L8sWsPISuPSwbXVRhlyV/vR2TRttGR8BrE/iMjmgT7LRQ1K/q nEiEIsrDsM5/zjLtLKAuKZzHofiCes4OJJP/3II=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4Q7IuUg/g3mJ9FWLiUwJKUFmgm3Eqkq1kXmX45bgwJJGFpNBqmPRf/4HopeBg50wJOkqYMDCDoTevOFmvNNS8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3207:b0:741:3a59:738d with SMTP id xg7-20020a170907320700b007413a59738dmr19971318ejb.110.1664222790801; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166400610162.62680.12901821351127538136@ietfa.amsl.com> <6E9ABA22-C1B4-490F-9965-199F47758DFA@juniper.net> <BY5PR11MB4337178C367451A521F6E64FC1529@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337178C367451A521F6E64FC1529@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:06:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4WKWOZVnwjgq6_j2Z2f5f=ZFq1KKhEXM=3jbjgPzqj3Xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045db4305e99a10f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/q_I1iJqTiAD7KBiZ17PrLw-mZq4>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:06:35 -0000

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:48 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>
wrote:

> I am not clear on why IEEE we would need/want to review this.
>
> The only reason that 802.1AX is referenced is because we refer to Link
> Aggregation Group (LAG).
> We aren't changing anything which is specified by IEEE.
>

Of course we are not changing anything which is specified by IEEE. This is
not the point. Documents like this one, that explicitly deal with the
interface between the layers defined by the IETF and other organizations
can benefit from a review from the perspective of the other SDO. As the
IETF and IEEE 802 have a very good cooperation relationship, it's quite
routine that such documents are being sent for cross-review. Both ways.

Regards,

Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email