Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A892D1200D8; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IR2XFtmKPdIr; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F90712001B; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id m25so3845489ioo.8; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SH7li7EDcb7gl78yOWBP8fQ9MsPuUjaAFMFoje4Lrpg=; b=P//Y40jWrvZh9TTAW3VBWfyAa1rD6j9K38mLUUKkvreLpF/zAcJk2BoRxEtaO/2w/p HCQdBOZKYKh5e/6pvSZq+0Le6ioRk0HVCfP9478242FOi6Y4MkiTTMVaqZVU25M/da+3 zqbUB9d5fwdhV2r+xtRqBXiDPv7BK2SPrQQcM4qWSzWCOKU4pKzkMcWKM8ADCDoU2s35 ojHOOUyLPFh/+W8AkIxaHWG1P+HsVIc9RkdsGCzjRslxsaF34kFPHoADo15wPKuoFeDx kGMz96DR0iVFU376C0s4QEA2rx9ihEd1q8UBNMA6z2htA1CjFIIKO+EynSCS8W3wcf4+ KYgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SH7li7EDcb7gl78yOWBP8fQ9MsPuUjaAFMFoje4Lrpg=; b=glLxItbZEl5pBgQRFgaU/D84E5WnUeNU9mYmo8X3+iycwJF1rrNH64JYI8QCo2Ruqn P9v0msU3/TBw7tTgNquJzTUXq9D4832PuwBpO6cR8vpOFq4DkvVmNe/aab2FxWDwWbix dZvDfiHySwiLn3uaGcqFIAp6vUiDLqgaSnR5cM2e3rXpC0S66VJ8yOJuI+rZ+OE5Iq1v llxJAebOGk4BNYzOH2KoQZuAldlbQ8A4KYnf4pDvwioYPDx4mbs8Xpx+S4JYmmD0YKdq UFe/GgYVQ0aav9Zau4/8QHDbalbd+KO2V+Kvir3xl+iXwJ13wq4SKjucySa8dm1RYkjp smYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHhgTiKG6aZCU+vKXNnJXpYpkccc3IenLgB3P4JspCD8qwNPSP xZBkwSdkHTeW+qoMRf/+/vqq5eQWi62iIyexo9CZGM/DXd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVCuDGATkKCkvbOY81HNP+cz4jjvC40gAtvBlN1hQbuixtyT6q4BrFjntDqSOvijnfqzyZN8PKyHch2l7zFGs=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cbd9:: with SMTP id u25mr4826470jaq.106.1579913782471; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:56:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy5-ejdjw5zgZgiF1hSyuiAErmas-dbWFmx1b+1vftT1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7b3dc059cec5763"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/qbvmAIfyAv1_fTFIbiQw8foLYmg>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:56:26 -0000

Hi,

Without any judgement, I wondered how this document relates to the IESG's
discuss criteria.[0]

In particular, this part: "Does this document represent an end run around
the IETF's working groups or its procedures?"

How does this document relate to this IESG procedure? Would publishing a
dissenting document on the independent stream constitute such an "end run"?

thanks,
Rob

[0] https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/iesg-discuss-criteria/