Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Rob Sayre <> Sat, 01 October 2022 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B81C1522BD; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 07:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxxbjr9fvucO; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42202C1522A1; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id dv25so14378279ejb.12; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=7QN1egyl86OYj0dBxB3IEwMvQXD1GF6WdgHB8YcAkWY=; b=ndLOIaav6CLQzvrO0QZ74pLAUQSblcaBulV41WnFSnJDuiiqj+QwMGiQdLQN9zSiwE bDoH+SiarX7KBIsy5ZZHe+Lt4UpFMDx439DFNl0MU+s90lk6vBfu0YzgZUxO03XZgGmf 5eoNZbnxZCPYwKAszWg1P9e70s/Sems9vIRqzaXq47AEPJxaUQx12SzNZ+l5N+OmfQ4b RPmSJmQoZL2Mzl4tgl42FDOuIhlg57bFXCKtaOpSROfxHJNfg/2Z+IjkpsGjCPekAYE6 SHxGR7CIKfJwRanNj94yEkXbXZyUfNBHw/THvoKnBguZSJbl793Ryt8tDSR37XJ3ROvL FvhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=7QN1egyl86OYj0dBxB3IEwMvQXD1GF6WdgHB8YcAkWY=; b=NhKHoG5m1bt/nvw7VLi2kZG+7jawmqN4SnJI4zdjEg6r1g6VBS/D6HjLRnuTPIRq0m izg9XujLJJh/rLM8k233APAdTQBkbfSDN5fiVPX9Qy6qS6xj4dtEEzExg4nHOVI+3LzH TfeLJXrNS85FJV6x/YYK7MycdjOrxLU/3cTPZmNQJrw0uoXBAc9x9NLmm3q7iVfYfs4b cheWmD/oB3Ee4ETnLfHg+Z9V6P413J9aJ6DKrgPJpL5OM6DW5PgBSm15M17YYP1aiZBw B8E3Y9WIjc82YAUVNj0D68SXJ1PFJvqqlLlvZt2wakBnF6f4ZGhdgaxAptxBm0mkybhc i8Aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1XfVDB5wwvuJW1P0rxnVyxIdFGp0uCKmi3vFroaWsWQpZbNkZN B51ZGUcxriyDROx72AdE3Srr35nz2oIJM69hjhw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5cUOV0mwBv0hIYwbuDrNq1jflxvxTww9VMp02SDjm/Uhrfev90IN9H5IX6UR0TrRD93dEYvzoDuy51cfxCiIU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e08:b0:73d:c724:4876 with SMTP id g8-20020a1709061e0800b0073dc7244876mr9642613ejj.62.1664636158066; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 07:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Rob Sayre <>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 07:55:46 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: "" <>
Cc: Martin Thomson <>, "" <>, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e1cd2105e9fa4e0e"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 14:56:04 -0000

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 12:12 AM <> wrote:

> oh, I could deal with Harkins. But the point is, no-one should have to
> deal with Harkins.

Fully agree. I have a list of people I mute, and that works for me. But you
can't just throw your hands up and lament the process if you care, because
newcomers will not have this knowledge. I asked for the reasoning because
people were saying it should have been earlier, and I agree.

The pattern I see is that people use non-technical lists to hold forth on
some strange topics. They could get a blog or something, but no one would
read it, so they use the IETF lists for the audience.

Anyway, I support this action, but there seems to be a structural issue as