Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-tls-32

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 17 November 2020 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A0E3A0E3D; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:39:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XlkijfhlGFwh; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 158553A0E3A; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:f87a:925d:978e:33a7] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:f87a:925d:978e:33a7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 173D761057E; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:39:17 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1605591557; bh=/t3I3oA4ouTlpXf5zhYRcw5PoJLK1l7cIcUbihmlxAc=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=ObI8qe+UtS7OyI1gWz1Tx2gfAwuyhMegZfhwLp2S+smItufXJ7sWQtCCIBHhpXRom qRjM/RU6SbN+83f5XhEPWB44k17i294eimLeECLqIwHtJ74thsOlAl2ApnvVvyxEft eYg3oJL+GqL0y/tNo69jcSa4/amNqVsurgB4HE2M=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <B881031D-BEBA-484E-8373-E4D7871E9A37@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_430607DB-DD7A-4265-B1C6-8E43180CAC0C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:39:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <160554525274.11282.16513170010870102745@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org, draft-ietf-quic-tls.all@ietf.org
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
References: <160554525274.11282.16513170010870102745@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 173D761057E.A628E
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/urPSmfXh48FN6w7nqrbn9SVn5P0>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-tls-32
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:39:27 -0000

Hi Sarah,

thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've created a separate issue for each of the items in your review and tagged you in it, see in-line responses for the precise issue link. All issues are tracked in the milestone https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/13

Since there are no issues raised, the single ticket at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4367 is already closed.

Thanks,
Lars

> On 2020-11-16, at 18:47, Sarah Banks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Sarah Banks
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Hi,
>    I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
>    ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
>    These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
>    aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call
>    may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and
>    WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
>    comments.
> 
> Status: Ready for publication
> 
>     Overall, I found this to be a very well written document. For a doc that
>     tracks at ~65 pages, I couldn't find any critiques, short of editorial
>     nits here and there. It reads as "thoughtful", and as if it's had the many
>     reviews and eyeballs on it as it seems to have had. I also appreciated the
>     feedback and advice regarding performance. A big thank you to the authors,
>     the WG, and the reviewers who pitched in; your effort shows.
> 
> Thanks
> Sarah
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call