Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Tue, 11 October 2022 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A79C14CE31 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nP7amS1Bq5Ns for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D22EC14CE2B for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitty.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0RJL1G7ICOOHM8@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for last-call@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:00:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.153] (kitty.dhcp.bergandi.net [10.0.42.19]) by kitty.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0RJL0020WOOFQA@kitty.bergandi.net> for last-call@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net ([98.97.56.124] EXTERNAL) (EHLO [192.168.1.153]) with TLS/SSL by kitty.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.19]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:17 -0700
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:00:15 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <307fb911-1085-e5e5-1a39-8d0938c37693@network-heretics.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Message-id: <1b1e8d97-ae74-a7f0-4f72-aef295ef45ec@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=kitty.bergandi.net, send-ip=98.97.56.124)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net [98.97.56.124] (EHLO [192.168.1.153])
References: <4ad75bdc-809e-3ff3-63df-c91e1297473a@lounge.org> <1818B715-D086-43E7-8B58-DE9E6F9D0627@aiven.io> <5d1f22b2-7629-664e-211e-a5b96586d333@lounge.org> <CAGL5yWbEXUszacKmwzUu2NPb7qY=5AhFg-R0q0OJqN4fifDkGg@mail.gmail.com> <307fb911-1085-e5e5-1a39-8d0938c37693@network-heretics.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [221003a] (kitty.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/wiYoQ5C8w6Zrxwqn6CGhjqZkqys>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:00:19 -0000


On 10/11/22 10:22 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> On 10/11/22 12:05, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> The issue is that I felt bullied off the ietf@ietf.org mailinglist by 
>> you and a few others. 
>
> Well, if we're going to talk about who has been bullied by whom, and 
> supply justification for such claims, we might be here a long time.
>
> I wonder what people even mean by the term "bullied" these days.  When 
> I was a kid, a bully was someone who used violence or a threat of 
> violence to attack less powerful people in order to build him/her-self up.
>
> Bullies always targeted people who were less powerful than themselves, 
> and generally also people who didn't have many friends who would come 
> to their aid.
>
> These days I have the impression that people think they're being 
> bullied merely because they're subject to criticism. That's not what 
> the word used to mean
>

   Yea, several years ago people started talking about how "speech is 
violence"
and there wasn't enough pushback. So now we have people talking about
being "bullied" from critical speech. Having gotten punched in the face 
before
I can testify that speech is not violence. When I was a kid the rhyme 
was "sticks
and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me."

   You make a good point about power. Bullies target the less powerful. So
it's interesting that I, an individual contributor with no formal leadership
role in the IETF, can be called vile names by the IETF Chair and the IETF
Executive Director, people who arguably are much more powerful than me,
and yet I'm the one accused of bullying!

   Dan.

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius