[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04

Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 06 December 2022 07:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: cdni@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167031225206.26941.4986394051580707829@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 23:37:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/xDHSiQxIUggO3QuGgCZNQlz2iho>
Subject: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04

Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area directors.  Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

The document introduces two new CDNI Metadata Footprint Types in addition to
those defined in RFC 8006. The document is well written and easy to understand.
I found no issues related to ART area.

Comment: it's a bit strange that document short title (which is repeated at the
top of each page) is very generic: "Content Delivery Network Interconnection".
I expected it to be more specific to the subject of the document, which only
defines two additional types.

[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf… Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-… Nir Sopher