Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tlds-to-historic-00.txt> (Moving TCP.INT and NSAP.INT infrastructure domains to historic)
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 08:19 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEDB3A1196
for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id M-SRTYRqZg4g for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com
[IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4333A11C5
for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.104.214])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 22U8IGx6015743
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail;
t=1648628323; x=1648714723; i=@elandsys.com;
bh=aCMkqvbBGJWS4S32y9cZJhuNskSrWDF4pMqPBV3vOLM=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
b=NXKzguQW3lQoTg7qNtREg3RasUrDNtf6RpH57Ys3MbtRni5+yRbwBN3WJy2nLfZEJ
kkiWWD+UzyI1dmdBba7f3yEW51pgpvbfr3PB3kzUeYeJ6vpnPoGxhYAHvogNQ5rW6e
sgA0TpFrBc2/za1JSvJwVr22pRqyxzjghkFTuShc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20220330004724.07d61520@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:12:39 -0700
To: last-call@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <164856629779.9339.936370626870755127@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164856629779.9339.936370626870755127@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/xRmRSZd09JVipouJc1XMgfRdD34>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call:
<status-change-int-tlds-to-historic-00.txt> (Moving TCP.INT and NSAP.INT
infrastructure domains to historic)
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>,
<mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>,
<mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:19:20 -0000
Hello, At 08:04 AM 29-03-2022, The IESG wrote: >The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering Group >IETF (iesg) to consider the following document: - 'Moving TCP.INT and >NSAP.INT infrastructure domains to historic' > <status-change-int-tlds-to-historic-00.txt> The IESG sent a request to itself. That looks odd. It took me a few minutes to figure out whether "tcp.int" existed or not. There may be a typo in the initial request. The policy for the subdomain is specified in RFC 1530. Can the IETF override that policy? The statement invoked by the IESG is for the reclassification of a RFC. If I am not mistaken, it was not intended for the reclassifying subdomains. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Brian Carpenter
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Joe Abley
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… John Levine
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… John C Klensin
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… John C Klensin
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <status-change-int-tld… Brian E Carpenter