Re: [ldapext] referencing attribute types

William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com> Thu, 09 November 2017 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wibrown@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BE1129467 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:20:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykk-ZqusdqOx for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698AF126C23 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90D84E90E; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 03:20:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rei.prd.blackhats.net.au (vpn2-54-118.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.118]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C21360BE3; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 03:20:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1510197640.25104.90.camel@redhat.com>
From: William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com>
To: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Str=F6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>, Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=FCnter?= <dk@sys4.de>, ldapext@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:20:40 +1000
In-Reply-To: <e7f961a5-cb26-7153-2f16-e47d63002679@stroeder.com>
References: <e47f76a5-a589-71de-3de2-e85c2f089748@sys4.de> <e7f961a5-cb26-7153-2f16-e47d63002679@stroeder.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5D9Ufo0hOk43p7uqKxX+"
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 03:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/A19vg3AcWrB0_al1jg3TMxPzjwk>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] referencing attribute types
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 03:20:47 -0000

On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 00:02 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Dieter Klünter wrote:
> > As we are going to restructure schemas and attribute types,
> 
> Huh? Which text in the ldapext draft charter indicates that we are
> "going to restructure schemas and attribute types"?
> 
> The work item "inetOrgPerson 2.0 schema" is meant to just update or
> replace RFC 2798. No more, no less. And I'd be willing to work on
> this one.
> 
> > I would suggest to adopt X.520 structure of attribute types. That
> > is
> 
> If you want to add work items you should come up with precise text
> for
> ldapext draft charter describing what to do. And you should commit
> yourself to work on it.
> 
> > I propose to map following attribute type originating from X.520 to
> > a
> > ldap schema:
> > 
> > dnQualifier and organizationIdentifier.
> 
> Personally I see no use for 'dnQualifier'. And
> 'organizationIdentifier'
> would be more suitable in a update for RFC 4519 which we do *not*
> have
> on our list yet.
> 
> Again:
> Just mentioning ideas here is not enough.
> You guys have to come up with charter text and put your name on work
> items!

Exactly. We need the charter done first. 

The dead line for that is approaching, so we need to consider
submitting it in it's current form. 

> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane