Re: [ldapext] referencing attribute types

[William Brown <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 00:02 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Dieter Klünter wrote:
> > As we are going to restructure schemas and attribute types,
> 
> Huh? Which text in the ldapext draft charter indicates that we are
> "going to restructure schemas and attribute types"?
> 
> The work item "inetOrgPerson 2.0 schema" is meant to just update or
> replace RFC 2798. No more, no less. And I'd be willing to work on
> this one.
> 
> > I would suggest to adopt X.520 structure of attribute types. That
> > is
> 
> If you want to add work items you should come up with precise text
> for
> ldapext draft charter describing what to do. And you should commit
> yourself to work on it.
> 
> > I propose to map following attribute type originating from X.520 to
> > a
> > ldap schema:
> > 
> > dnQualifier and organizationIdentifier.
> 
> Personally I see no use for 'dnQualifier'. And
> 'organizationIdentifier'
> would be more suitable in a update for RFC 4519 which we do *not*
> have
> on our list yet.
> 
> Again:
> Just mentioning ideas here is not enough.
> You guys have to come up with charter text and put your name on work
> items!

Exactly. We need the charter done first. 

The dead line for that is approaching, so we need to consider
submitting it in it's current form. 

> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext
-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane