Re: [ldapext] IETF 96

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D798112D8C8 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id breuxG-_fnpd for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC9A12D8C9 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b1ad.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [31.133.177.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10C6550A85; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160408105744.2014cf1e@pink.avci.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:08:03 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0BACDBD-D0BC-4CB8-92A1-B548763B547F@seantek.com>
References: <20160408105744.2014cf1e@pink.avci.de>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Dieter_Kl=C3=BCnter?= <dk@sys4.de>, ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/EJLO8E4RlHzkfB7RHJeWmEqBm_E>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] IETF 96
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:08:36 -0000

In my opinion, yes. Sean

> On Apr 8, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Dieter Klünter <dk@sys4.de>; wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> the IETF 96 Session will be held on July 17. - 22. in Berlin. Should
> this working group meet at Berlin? 
> 
> -Dieter
> 
> -- 
> [*] sys4 AG
> Tel.: +49 (89) 30 904 664
> http://sys4.de
> Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
> 
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
> Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext