IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ldapext] Request for feedback: draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken

William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 23:57 UTC

Return-Path: <wibrown@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A531296BD for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaLj1m7eKB68 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A0A129625 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A901F805E for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rei.prd.blackhats.net.au (ovpn-116-15.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.15]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9QNvV0S030846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <1477526243.5137.0.camel@redhat.com>
From: William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com>
To: ldapext@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:57:23 +1000
In-Reply-To: <1473028512.26123.43.camel@redhat.com>
References: <1473028512.26123.43.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TtQJwXUSR5OvfZplOrkY"
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/EPfD4_jdhIQYK6iRvY4csn_AAfE>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Request for feedback: draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:57:36 -0000

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 08:35 +1000, William Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to ask for feedback on the submission
> draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken [0]. Section 5 deals with the ldap components
> of the implementation.
> 
> Thank you for your time and advice,
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken/


Hi,

This has been updated with feedback some time ago. I would appreciate
further comment and review,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken-01


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email