IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ldapext] why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?

Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> Sun, 14 December 2014 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@stroeder.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3781A0118 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:35:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gg-w1sz9EtRX for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com (srv1.stroeder.com [213.240.180.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0911A0117 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:35:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3CC6033C; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:35:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stroeder.com
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.stroeder.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAvKwZ9Y9_cD; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:35:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.1.0.2] (unknown [10.1.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "michael@stroeder.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Client CA" (verified OK)) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3EB602E4; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 17:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <548DCA51.7080002@stroeder.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 18:35:13 +0100
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeilenga@isode.com>
References: <548DB67C.5060009@stroeder.com> <CF47C8D4-038D-4232-96F8-5EDE3A62C7D2@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF47C8D4-038D-4232-96F8-5EDE3A62C7D2@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010602020900010802090301"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/OSr3Q_E79ERgXILaktXSBFCRjqc
Cc: ldapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ldapext] why posixAccount MUST contain 'cn'?
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 17:35:29 -0000

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> I'd be in favour of relaxing this to MAY cn in RFC2307bis.
> 
> See BCP 118 [RFC 4521], Section 5 concerning IETF rules for changing previously published schema definitions.

Yes, but RFC2307bis also changes posixGroup schema.

Ciao, Michael.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email