[ldapext] Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10

Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> Wed, 11 March 2015 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@stroeder.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600C91A8AB6 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fW3bg_kOhfBw for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FC01A8885 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1426074003; l=7891; s=domk; d=stroeder.com; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From: Date; bh=iazTgs8Vt6zRk1o2wpgzhfLEQY1eVR/DHgarVJprvsY=; b=kC7DPMmczayOVkmIYvSaHwc6ZmwZMF+zslIZXV603ofdXJYr4T7ypXBOuqsYCyiEPkM gVmtw+YdpNFxTu5a7NBCP7+b8FQIwakfyaAwX15skjyUV9MJS0oL6YbJnPqGem6eUrheM MbzqcarNIUXH6stYdloCIqKk4UJnNt1RL28=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWUHfUGtd9+vE/nIU31usF8LLMefsb7+CgbCKRTRv1L3o9ypgEohmronRDb4wQ==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from nb2.stroeder.local (p4FDB78D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.219.120.215]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id L07779r2BBe1bye (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:40:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <55002991.3020606@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:40:01 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Str=c3=b6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>
References: <20150309192352.16035.43655.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150309192352.16035.43655.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150309192352.16035.43655.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms070407050301030609030705"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/PS8BKuiGH0bLe_TXpE86OwHKFAw>
Subject: [ldapext] Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:40:09 -0000

HI!

Anyone aware of this or even reviewed this draft?
Should we encourage the authors to discuss on ldapext mailing list?

Ciao, Michael.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:23:52 -0700
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
To: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>rg>,
draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema@ietf.org
CC: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, ietf-announce@ietf.org

The IESG has completed a review of draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
consistent with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for Printer Services'
<draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10.txt> as an Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema/

The process for such documents is described at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary