Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...

Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <clem.oudot@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3031A00FA for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:51:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05C4936pu1KC for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4D7E1A0145 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pdbft15 with SMTP id ft15so6509744pdb.5 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:51:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cvldwHNtICnlNwaAd4Vnowksd6G3GHvfAv0iuVQpuqE=; b=mOch1wkJDKbx9B8EkVUNn1RVQzlSqbr9XubGxDcuQFOcWq/hw3JkO34CCooepOEA91 8Hn3aIn/PqnZRH2Dw1/8hHCzpwDVkghXQD3++WTibX4gZmrA7NgVmWd5znEetb+d5GgY gLXpAPDBdc5pN+scI07TeObj9js9i/yVQaTk9w5EWImf+M1GjOfCkXluRqhUgYjjHza8 4E0mROrUvn2KHDW5TCofEMMO8HBsVbl/Mf5AmGXkWAec/ad2GkL7mn58mXV1XfIoahZP 2lknFABjLqfEM76eDwO961ceM8ZwM295sYUX8k08OyI78RRhlGxTAqm8seTo50W3P5Pp wioQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.224.6 with SMTP id qy6mr3775015pbc.155.1423126278595; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:51:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.44.48 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:51:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54C56900.8010105@stroeder.com>
References: <etPan.54c553b0.19e21bb2.1f2@lpm.local> <CAPcb_GJpf=KGYbfhfyU92Ea3Dvvvw_hb08z0US75SzUCd9iukQ@mail.gmail.com> <54C55A27.8020903@stroeder.com> <CAK_oV4_pJUZrrgaA0RzkJPGVPNG+EtYS0aQe-RRbJfbyA7dG+A@mail.gmail.com> <54C56900.8010105@stroeder.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:51:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK_oV4_WSDvJrqRgoiQX4ccT0KtVNeugyiX7uwYRNCBFX1R=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_OUDOT?= <clem.oudot@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Str=C3=B6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/ZP8ozlAuV1oRCML7xgxV-o_Mji8>
Cc: LDAP Extensions list <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 08:51:20 -0000

2015-01-25 23:06 GMT+01:00 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>om>:
> Clément OUDOT wrote:
>> 2015-01-25 22:03 GMT+01:00 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>om>:
>>> Gavin Henry wrote:
>>>>> I would also like to hear about volunteers to work on those documents, either contributing text or reviewing them carefully.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to help where I can.
>>>
>>> Glad to here that. Do you have any particular interest.
>>>
>>> Everybody can start reviewing existing stuff.  Which could also mean that you
>>> simply ask questions if something is not clear enough.
>>>
>>> For inetOrgPerson 2.0 it would help if we collect a wish list and then compile
>>> a realistic requirement list from that.
>>
>> I am also volunteer to help, especially on the password policy draft.
>
> Would you be willing to act as an editor?
>
> If yes, then simply start a new e-mail thread.
>
> A good start would be to agree on a goal.
>
> IMHO we should try to mainly document current state of implementations of
> draft-behera-ldap-password-policy, but also have a closer look on Appendix A
> of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zeilenga-ldap-passwords-00
>
> Digging the list archives could also help here.


Hi,

thanks for the inputs, I will do my best to work on this. I'll try to
start on new thread on the subject.


Clément OUDOT.