Re: [ldapext] Revive ldapext WG?
Charlie <medievalist@gmail.com> Thu, 02 October 2014 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <medievalist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81B81A026E for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDImGkQT-J9A for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 605DA1A0034 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id pn19so2513862lab.0 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PWkMoHf4dSlflmluDRpdqUgBas1oGhuE43FpVTvHHaw=; b=X2t2CUOlpichBkZOlz5C0VkoOsKjmuhbCpxXE2UlgN63YkgT4g2Ma6ezgS8x4NkQq+ lOAVRpRxoSo8Rhze5xiRpMU9ojQka6kWrHcw0h52sCz8UJE2ExaB0UyUNpmILmyH5ijH BlBwc0CqG6mVlQqFD3ld5vkjc4nqC3mHyoYiw8RjTqKi+RHsv7A/KzDrOqTxZmiyMPM1 DW5VjdzRJij0wPTvuzJ728B7JXPFLlWC/VkLchLA6n2ul+8/k7lq7JX5gNnibC178nqL 8pXa6PM1aUkb2kUQr3NXQIoxwIZxWg37Ex9WhkHwe/ATxNT9rI0/MtYy0Wgtn6Lni3T1 p7cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.21.98 with SMTP id u2mr64486418lae.60.1412260538718; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.161.170 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <54255AC1.8040705@stroeder.com>
References: <54255AC1.8040705@stroeder.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:35:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJb3uA5-JcH-5+eeijZYOtYqJuF2GoUvv01Gq-sW1Dpr3oWiqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charlie <medievalist@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/cEp_B23t0smurgdGju1fdj9oBMA
Cc: ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Revive ldapext WG?
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:35:41 -0000
Micheal Stroeder schriebt: Should IETF WG ldapext should be revived? Yes. --Charlie Brooks On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> wrote: > HI! > > AFAICS independent draft submissions can only reach informational or > experimental status. > > But I think it should be possible to reach standard status for some important > drafts (like ppolicy draft as discussed at LDAPcon 2013). > > What do you think about it? > Should IETF WG ldapext should be revived? > > Ciao, Michael. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ldapext mailing list > Ldapext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext >
- [ldapext] Revive ldapext WG? Michael Ströder
- Re: [ldapext] Revive ldapext WG? Clément OUDOT
- Re: [ldapext] Revive ldapext WG? Charlie