Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...

Mark R Bannister <dbis@proseconsulting.co.uk> Tue, 27 January 2015 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dbis@proseconsulting.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B76D1A8795 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:03:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxwxoggL26iw for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982E51A876C for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host86-178-119-20.range86-178.btcentralplus.com ([86.178.119.20] helo=[192.168.1.67]) by mail11.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dbis@proseconsulting.co.uk>) id 1YG4rc-0000YZ-IJ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:24 +0000
Message-ID: <54C77E7A.6010506@proseconsulting.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:06 +0000
From: Mark R Bannister <dbis@proseconsulting.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ludovic Poitou <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com>, ldapext@ietf.org
References: <etPan.54c553b0.19e21bb2.1f2@lpm.local>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.54c553b0.19e21bb2.1f2@lpm.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailcore-Auth: 12040446
X-Mailcore-Domain: 1286164
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/iXlQJdEaJmghJ1oT0w62elq9KvY>
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBTdHLDtmRlcg==?= <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:29 -0000

On 25/01/2015 20:36, Ludovic Poitou wrote:
>   
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Over the years, there has been a number of documents related to the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) that have been left unfinished or are slowly progressing.
>
> There are a number of individuals that have interest in re-forming an IETF Working Group around LDAP to finish some of the work and make them on the Standard Track. Howard Chu and I are ready to lead that effort.
>
> I’d like to poll the audience of this mailing list on the interest of seeing this progressing. I would also like to hear about volunteers to work on those documents, either contributing text or reviewing them carefully.
>
> Please find below the list of documents that have been considered for the working group to finalise and get published (in no specific order):
>
> draft-findlay-ldap-groupofentries
> draft-stroeder-namedobject
> draft-stroeder-hashed-userpassword-values (informational
> draft-stroeder-mailboxrelatedobject
> RFC2307bis
> draft-behera-ldap-password-policy
> inetOrgPerson 2.0
>
> Ludovic
>
> --
> Ludovic Poitou
> http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
>
>

Hi Ludovic,

The following internet drafts are intended to replace RFC2307 and 
RFC2307bis.  They were first released for review in August 2013, 
although lack of a working group left them largely unreviewed.  I did, 
however, receive many comments from this mailing list a year ago which I 
incorporated in later versions:

draft-bannister-dbis-mapping
draft-bannister-dbis-netgroup
draft-bannister-dbis-passwd
draft-bannister-dbis-hosts
draft-bannister-dbis-devices
draft-bannister-dbis-automounter
draft-bannister-dbis-custom

I have subsequently produced a reference implementation in Python, and 
we are close to having our first large-scale enterprise deployment of 
DBIS.  See http://dbis.sf.net

I would prefer to see RFC2307bis removed from the list to be considered 
above, and replaced by the DBIS drafts.

I am also very happy to volunteer my time to review or contribute 
further to the other documents you mention.

Please let me know.

Best regards,
Mark Bannister.