Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 11 March 2015 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95F1A8A7D for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKdnN9hjnc5y for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198EB1A8912 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1426074638; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=nrJLLJzHnkm2L41/atyRuCmxfo18G9Q2TjuczdBPtwg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=dKBZ4mlvFz+pYknynD/cHtDxNWb9hOPu+b7h3IwEEIzt9vcs3gyN4VUwnZJawg/znNw1dk uI9iQdrHaQiQKNadfj4oJnd8gSvdrNY5upXkGVYjdn3Ypk8lj0srdB4qaKBEMQxtt+92KQ 4aU5tcv6w0izuG3ovaIuP/dOVsvEPe8=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VQAsDgAj8wgl@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:38 +0000
Message-ID: <55002C0D.8020704@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:37 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Michael_Str=F6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>, ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>
References: <20150309192352.16035.43655.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55002991.3020606@stroeder.com>
In-Reply-To: <55002991.3020606@stroeder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060404060904030106010800"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/tatkYVs_7R06PPJXUtDnic1emmw>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:43 -0000

Hi Michael,

On 11/03/2015 11:40, Michael Ströder wrote:
> HI!
>
> Anyone aware of this or even reviewed this draft?
Yes, I was asked to review.
> Should we encourage the authors to discuss on ldapext mailing list?
Generally a good idea.
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:23:52 -0700
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
> To: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>rg>,
> draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema@ietf.org
> CC: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
>
> The IESG has completed a review of draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10
> consistent with RFC5742.
>
>
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Lightweight Directory
> Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for Printer Services'
> <draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema-10.txt> as an Informational RFC.
>
>
> The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
> and IETF work.
>
> The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> ballot and the history log.
>
> The IESG review is documented at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema/
>
> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcdonald-ldap-printer-schema/
>
> The process for such documents is described at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html
>
> Thank you,
>
> The IESG Secretary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext