Re: [ldapext] DBIS commentary

Ludovic Poitou <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com> Tue, 01 December 2015 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D20E1A90F7 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TW4Cuv8x-q65 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FF51A90FA for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pacej9 with SMTP id ej9so3392308pac.2 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:51:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=N/pnfQmayNMg6oDY5A4tINVXGQG/cLx+yXE8JLWO0Zo=; b=f/g38x88PrmY9HVUI8tI3SvMJBYSY5ALWmvdwD2TPJKrnwxEWqkIMVHgktcYrw3jGS UXLQ+pz4a8XYhu8JOAJFKNuxqLgkLPlTxYdkclUUu7Jv+zEeKB3qRdchVpl3+bhVO/h+ zYuQDmxFEhnppz/tMhfeJxT9q/7ddBk393AsKbQAyNbNCmJ/C4m3oyTCT2E7Lk0LbalA oRxzbZ8mGImnu9jmbAjXl3WpuoV0uYW0vaTifoYY0KLsUf6AX9aR7CigQwbOn41TSZjZ i/bRFrypGcxWGuTof4gS5eyJJ4gCuShMgw9Cj8OOrORi47d2h1w4h655HV6LsDPapmv9 zxTg==
X-Received: by 10.98.89.196 with SMTP id k65mr79349843pfj.12.1448970667042; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lpm.att.net (99-7-168-171.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.7.168.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lg14sm58292282pab.45.2015.12.01.03.51.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 03:51:03 -0800
From: Ludovic Poitou <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com>
To: Jordan Brown <jordan.brown@oracle.com>, =?utf-8?Q?Bannister=2C_Mark?= <mark.bannister@morganstanley.com>
Message-ID: <etPan.565d89a7.a50744b.e9ad@lpm.att.net>
In-Reply-To: <814F4E458AA9FF4E89CF1A9EDA0DE2A932F8EAFD@OZWEX0209N2.msad.ms.com>
References: <5655E4F0.7030809@oracle.com> <814F4E458AA9FF4E89CF1A9EDA0DE2A932F618A3@OZWEX0209N1.msad.ms.com> <565CAC30.6010701@oracle.com> <814F4E458AA9FF4E89CF1A9EDA0DE2A932F8EAFD@OZWEX0209N2.msad.ms.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (338)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="565d89a7_149b8945_e9ad"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/vefhNjbHWkwr5VYaDbIn2wv2ZT0>
Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?ldapext=40ietf.org?=" <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] DBIS commentary
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:51:09 -0000

Just a quick note: there is no new LDAPEXT charter, but a Proposal to reform LDAPEXT and a draft charter being discussed.

Regards,

Ludovic.

From: Bannister, Mark <mark.bannister@morganstanley.com>
Reply: Bannister, Mark <mark.bannister@morganstanley.com>
Date: 1 December 2015 at 02:13:39
To: Jordan Brown <jordan.brown@oracle.com>
CC: ldapext@ietf.org <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [ldapext] DBIS commentary  

You might want to point that out in a separate thread, as I say, RFC2307bis is on the new
LDAPEXT charter but those running with the new charter may not be reading these email
chains in any depth.
 



-- 
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.com