Re: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214)

[Eric Burger <[e-mail]>]

Bringing Alexey in, as I think we killed the LEMONADE list long ago…

Alexey - did you build a URLAUTH=BINARY implementation? Do you know if anyone did?

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Dave Cridland <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:37, Eric Burger <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> Resending with a better address for Dave, as he’s key to the question.
> 
>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Eric Burger <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hmmmm. It has been over a decade. What did people implement?
>> 
>> From the RFC:
>> The capability is URLAUTH=BINARY.
>> The command is URLFETCH (… BINARY …)
>> 
> 
> 
> Yes, it's been a while.
> 
> And I'm not actually sure if anyone ever did implement this. I'm certainly unsure how I'd find out now - Alexey would know about Isode M-Box, and if that doesn't implement I'm not sure what else would. I've looked at both my client (Polymer - been a while since I looked at that, too), and Panda IMAP, and neither support it.
> 
> If Alexey doesn't support this, then my suspicion is that nobody does.
>>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 4:31 AM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5524,
>>> "Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts".
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6214 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6214>
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Editorial
>>> Reported by: Дилян Палаузов <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> 
>>> Section: 6
>>> 
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> This document defines the URLFETCH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA has added it to the registry accordingly.
>>> 
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> This document defines the URLAUTH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA is asked to replace URLFETCH=BINARY with URLAUTH=BINARY in the IMAP registry.
>>> 
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> This document talks about URLAUTH=BINARY.  Mentioning URLFETCH=BINARY in the IANA section was not intended.
>>> 
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC5524 (draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts
>>> Publication Date    : May 2009
>>> Author(s)           : D. Cridland
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service environments
>>> Area                : Applications
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
>