Re: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214)

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 24 June 2020 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3154B3A0DE1 for <lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cridland.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhxidlI6rlDT for <lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D31B3A0C5D for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id l2so1018087wmf.0 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X9WN2HMcax3BSTDq32brqPnYl/NjaR2fKjaYdSt7gqI=; b=ZnnNW2brPVMK6FGnrNzb2tRAYiho0adzszPLBA/aOzJ7d7P9sOWFRT8JwMhOFsj4mM E9QtsWsnD9N4HMeMP4p/kJ7yOT5XY5efPRMW4E+ptVQpTutSe2TDa0BqfDIPF2WSLrRH gEXmFepM7BvK9HB68I11zCkjPPnHP/xAXIwr4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X9WN2HMcax3BSTDq32brqPnYl/NjaR2fKjaYdSt7gqI=; b=gpDPMZxc2CWDMsDn9/mjn9qEvWvDNwXxNv1liOPfFnlTrFpoTPCq/DwMJs8kEq9r1W UGbsVE+HIcdWC3UFEC2uvEuz3vmQ95xdr4Vym46CxrEEBNT3OTIJv7UDVnyKUdFwTU4E Ios87nRX4jlu8I/svVRBH2t0F80dAUFz/jsglk3Bp02Obo4w51qNPrPSoJtJGwwTogaK PzbGgUtBW3FES3X+y5ZUhNOCfMHcwC/QwsJ1UkdjDUH3Nru6RI3KYZgQvkogsPfnWOmV 2Xr5zGOS7dPnE8T3io+PH+juL6cjipF3FRf2hxRzEJZNfmljpR7Djs5XDT52/aQzFmaD Vwwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rg4VVY12EtShnHGuDa2VWATakUqsUqTiNtvXE8l7FQW78rQTA tXt+bPrFQiBH0rVSDtOIGsf+8qr0Avo72It0WuxoBQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMe7ILCrJGIFPx1Vrs12531oiTkAS0TnZ5ujlt5n2C7KWBgsDelbiFwmylmXdapYe5Hmn9z0XcqsLyE67kqgc=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b182:: with SMTP id a124mr28304354wmf.114.1593004740442; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200624083124.918E7F4071A@rfc-editor.org> <381B71A9-FEE2-4232-8091-1F9939255F98@standardstrack.com> <B75C5465-BEC4-412F-8CED-0BE21DA18678@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <B75C5465-BEC4-412F-8CED-0BE21DA18678@standardstrack.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:18:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzy2ypcGsT7wwQjVxnORUB4a_QPTjGvnvdPQM3LR-vKPaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Leiba Barry <barryleiba@computer.org>, Parsons Glenn <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com>, dpa-ietf@aegee.org, lemonade@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ae1f1405a8d451ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lemonade/cNOaztHlTH3VhuO0HaCe0QPO1Dw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:19:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214)
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lemonade/>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:19:04 -0000

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:37, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
wrote:

> Resending with a better address for Dave, as he’s key to the question.
>
> On Jun 24, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hmmmm. It has been over a *decade. *What did people implement?
>
> From the RFC:
> The capability is URLAUTH=BINARY.
> The command is URLFETCH (… BINARY …)
>
>
Yes, it's been a while.

And I'm not actually sure if anyone ever did implement this. I'm certainly
unsure how I'd find out now - Alexey would know about Isode M-Box, and if
that doesn't implement I'm not sure what else would. I've looked at both my
client (Polymer - been a while since I looked at that, too), and Panda
IMAP, and neither support it.

If Alexey doesn't support this, then my suspicion is that nobody does.

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 4:31 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5524,
> "Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6214
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Дилян Палаузов <dpa-ietf@aegee.org>
>
> Section: 6
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> This document defines the URLFETCH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA has added
> it to the registry accordingly.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> This document defines the URLAUTH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA is asked
> to replace URLFETCH=BINARY with URLAUTH=BINARY in the IMAP registry.
>
> Notes
> -----
> This document talks about URLAUTH=BINARY.  Mentioning URLFETCH=BINARY in
> the IANA section was not intended.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5524 (draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts
> Publication Date    : May 2009
> Author(s)           : D. Cridland
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse
> service environments
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>
>