Re: [lemonade] [Errata Verified] RFC4469 (4046)

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Fri, 11 July 2014 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F77B1A0AFE for <lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmC6LtJvUKzz for <lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D09E1B2927 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id g18so1611904oah.37 for <lemonade@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eYZoHczu3Oj90xtNUBesnd6E6mFEjA+DGZJcbPRmByo=; b=QZqXqrYpqvC9Vy+H+18Hj6O+qznGlIjMBs7AmpXzNcUIpXLy3CsMyL9BufsqJPrmnI or2ntngbBas/DodL24lCWA8vBoxf9fx8mTI5L0Y5uR6AXq1GDwtXYz/QDUOoiGO67o0t ff92pGQEqZpROXla7+M9F5BWQ486H24/HSqr4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eYZoHczu3Oj90xtNUBesnd6E6mFEjA+DGZJcbPRmByo=; b=Y87OVJbl7gft9iocjju8p9aP6WlBtv960Y832z5b4RD9uFgoavrtbu1GYuSwW+T+lz M+ddGfWHGOZMWNPkQoaIywQlI1xZgdXsQvlduCcWJ6vEL0WpZvLqzTCIhPE/uaVfMNhJ IfJipdoJlDPSpivSOfCi2XKN1MxfouCJX8WWB4ZBZDDhjE7t1CC9p/8sLdhj910IWjsd dnRA47H/mHPvu9zMA1sD1YBtS8GH+93Ulty33ZMiUsgQL61mPQYP4r16dGrciXSqok8/ wiE6d/1QPxu3C2ptZIwRWk+3XuuO/HQB0smCvm77raX8Wh6j6HyPCQ3b4eDYZw+qa441 IOuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkI75GFeeJ7iSiPCxC+tiZtToPF+VTR6veI1JNDCwZDi1vDfFNRUv695iLd+k3goAkJimq
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.18.69 with SMTP id u5mr898891obd.54.1405103621460; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.134.145 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140710180151.726DD18B5B5@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20140710180151.726DD18B5B5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:33:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzziW+bmx_eZJJrYPLUgOM=ZsdHEQ-XppKjEA2nnDjSckQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c338aa3af5be04fdef2e51"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lemonade/yh5iAFyYYP8eeEAps4Y5dzHPwus
Cc: "lemonade@ietf.org" <lemonade@ietf.org>, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lemonade] [Errata Verified] RFC4469 (4046)
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lemonade/>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:33:43 -0000

On 10 July 2014 19:01, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

>    "The astring in the definition of url and the url-resp-text in the
>    definition of badurl-response-code each contain an imapurl as defined
>    by [2]."
>
>
I parsed that sentence three times to imply that url-resp-text was an
astring.

It doesn't say that, but I kept reading "The astring in the definition of
url and the url-resp-text" as a unit - I'd say that's begging for a comma.

I wonder what actual implementations do.

Dave.