IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287781A0390 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cb6A_TRHZ3gx for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51291ACDA2 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f790b6d000004359-a2-550a882987bd
Received: from EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.81]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3D.36.17241.9288A055; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:22:49 -0400
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
Thread-Index: AQHQYaiYN0g/mjHeuEOl+b0OAMHWpp0jVoaA///a+nA=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:22:48 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9349D7@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <5509C284.5000903@gmail.com> <D12F7F4E.B97C7%dekumar@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D12F7F4E.B97C7%dekumar@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPoK5WB1eowbaLTBaP5y5gtfi56hO7 Rc/qZmaLA98dLC6s/8XiwOox5fdGVo+ds+6ye7QcecvqsWTJTyaP601X2QNYo7hsUlJzMstS i/TtErgy9mw9zFLwkLti5wTBBsbznF2MnBwSAiYSz3atZYWwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRR4vvy fiYIZzmjxJZzX9hBqtgEjCRebOxhB0mICFxmlJg8ezpQOweHsICBxKepISCmiIChxL1V4iDl IgJWEtP6zrKA2CwCqhLPLjwHG8Mr4CtxouMvM4gtJOAt8XDeBCaQVk4BfYmeVheQMCPQPd9P rWECsZkFxCVuPZnPBHGngMSSPeeZIWxRiZeP/0Hdryixr386O0S9jsSC3Z/YIGxtiWULXzND rBWUODnzCcsERtFZSMbOQtIyC0nLLCQtCxhZVjFylBanluWmGxluYgTG0DEJNscdjAs+WR5i FOBgVOLhLWDmChViTSwrrsw9xCjNwaIkzlt25WCIkEB6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6p BsbFtzeZ2do7vGyq2JUTZPO1+pfzNZn5sxx5NiRpc599qZDRa5g6q/qI7Eu+9TWTje1Nvk+b JHXfuvmVzs1zV2Ls0+Xdzt6tWuk6Qyht+8GVlyb6G7Ncns6QulrROL/8GKOP0rVK/2PXa1tO fmmbcsRv3eu3783lXfMWTFj2O1Yz8cfr7eGvHBWVWIozEg21mIuKEwFrYeVhggIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/L8qEC3IQL-vT559_cR8zL3FxgBI>
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:23:00 -0000

Hi Deepak,
I thought I agree with Tom that topology of monitored object, e.g. p2p or mp2mp, is technology-independent OAM-wise but your view puts topology against ... topology. Perhaps you can illustrate or give definition to what you view as technology-independent topology and how it is different from the topology of monitored object.

	Regards,
		Greg
	

-----Original Message-----
From: Deepak Kumar (dekumar) [mailto:dekumar@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 7:21 PM
To: Tom Taylor; Qin Wu; Gregory Mirsky; Ronald Bonica; lime-oam-model@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

I agree with Tom, Topology is technology-independent and should belong to generic model and expand it in technology specific model with specific like p2p, p2mp, etc..

Thanks,
Deepak

On 3/18/15 11:23 AM, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:

>Below with [PTT].
>
>On 17/03/2015 10:57 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Greg:
>...
>>
>> [Qin]: Do you proposed to add p2p and p2mp,bi-directional, 
>> uni-direcational as part of LIME generic model, or add them as part 
>> of technology-specific data model extensions?
>>
>[PTT] I would think topology is technology-independent as an abstract 
>concept, and therefore belongs in the generic model. To bring that in 
>line with reality, there would have to be interplay with the 
>technology-specific models to indicate which topologies these models 
>support.
>
>...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email