Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Sat, 21 March 2015 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E561A1BAC for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qYCbCBoFnqsz for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E584A1A1B91 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f790b6d000004359-d1-550d4f5f409a
Received: from EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.78]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0C.48.17241.F5F4D055; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:00:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:57:50 -0400
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'Tom Taylor' <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu@huawei.com>, 'Ronald Bonica' <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
Thread-Index: AQHQYoJiykHBSQ+yNkK8ruxTxTBlyp0k6zgAgACnH4CAAV48gIAAIt6AgAAzeAD///MLMA==
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 17:57:49 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B937323@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <CO1PR05MB4422C6491A3B7179F229574AE130@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F482@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84702B17@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F643@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84704C4C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92FA5F@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847066E3@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B930603@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <BLUPR05MB433DD2E1CBEDF363CB13884AE010@BLUPR05MB433.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8470BE79@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9349F2@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <550B2FEF.1030402@gmail.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8470D37B@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <550C13BD.60209@! gmail.com> <015f01d063b9$46c0bb80$d4423280$@olddog.co.uk> <550D56C9.1030! 406@gmail.com> <019a01d063e4$7443fb50$5ccbf1f0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <019a01d063e4$7443fb50$5ccbf1f0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLrHTzfBnzfUYO1sDosfPTeYLR7PXcBq 8XPVJ3aLntXNzBYHvjtYXFj/i8WBzWPK742sHjtn3WX3aDnyltVjyZKfTB7Xm66ye6zYvJIx gC2KyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+PhuhOMBTe4K/Y2rmJrYNzD2cXIySEhYCLxc/VkFghbTOLCvfVs XYxcHEICRxgltl3pgnKWM0osvbyAHaSKTcBI4sXGHnaQhIjADUaJlb/es4IkmIESe5f1MXUx cnAICxhIfJoaAmKKCBhK3FslDmGGSdzbmA1SzCKgKrHxBUQxr4CvxLN7RRCbdnBI3Lz5mQ2k hlPAWuLfgZNMIDYj0G3fT61hglgkLnHryXwmiJsFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpKY8/oaM0S9 jsSC3Z/YIGxtiWULX4PFeQUEJU7OfMIygVFsFpKxs5C0zELSMgtJywJGllWMHKXFqWW56UaG mxiBEXdMgs1xB+OCT5aHGAU4GJV4eAuW8YQKsSaWFVfmHmKU5mBREuctu3IwREggPbEkNTs1 tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOjofLbn4UX5DM7D63eWab5cr//VcUH/0s3Ozw/tifEsfreh/bL Dn5p36M/rBY5PTN98q6T/Hrz4y6ofWL9aDNp6TUHZrGZf49e0/H2XR3hwGDsPn+JePv/4sYF pfYyCkWPOx8E7J129mt77OLoZ37SfHvnXXVm+Vwm5l3WwBn+ta9yl230ohxWJZbijERDLeai 4kQAgwBQIpkCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/QtZzVbs4zcZ3r9STWjQkvUPDEPs>
Cc: "'Deepak Kumar (dekumar)'" <dekumar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 17:57:53 -0000

Hi Adrian, et. al,
the only identified common OAM function identified so far is ping/traceroute. But this is, primarily, on-demand functions and do not require configuration but are, what is referred, long-running command, which is sort of challenge for Netconf  but not specific to LIME discussion. Configuration of OAM, as I think of it, is primarily for proactive OAM tools, e.g. BFD Async, TWAMP in IP. And that where I find RFC 7276 and attempt to extend TRIL OAM to IP and LDP-based IP/MPLS OAMs come short.

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:37 AM
To: 'Tom Taylor'; 'Qin Wu'; Gregory Mirsky; 'Ronald Bonica'; lime-oam-model@ietf.org
Cc: 'Deepak Kumar (dekumar)'
Subject: RE: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

> Bottom line: I'm saying that the generic LIME model should be able to 
> trigger performance monitoring regardless of the layer under examination.

Well say "attempt to" because, if the layer doesn't support a particular OAM function, obviously it won't be triggered.
Similarly, if an implementation is missing that function.

But beyond that, yes, there is a set of generic OAM functions that need to be in the LIME model for config and enablement.
Since the model is generic and layer-independent, we would assume that the function set in the LIME model is a superset of the functions in any specific known layer.

A