IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

"Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dekumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2046E1A7D85 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tj2yYcodY4s2 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29341A802A for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=837; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1426731685; x=1427941285; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pdfIn0ca+cK2drv3r5WsbVqFY9IRG2pIVw9/Viqh7A4=; b=QtN5owB0QglB2jZsJp6/QIkIHQb7+BwL18eoXaOQ7a4DbqIftNLUqhCL Vt/QUzkc4/iT5qyNR9x+QdnHFMqjE/prFPGFlhj+DC2IHiqKNIGfoPBTv fC3jXZWWqt/qWiXh1u26JYTtAag87YKci+1QLjqVPEolqHc3etHwEfOnn c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AxBQB7MQpV/5pdJa1cgwaBLATMEAKBWEwBAQEBAQF9hBABAQQ6UQEIGB4xESUCBAESiBsDEcgBDYUwAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBHYsXgSOBIYI0hC0BBJBGiCGBTI1/hicig25vAYFDfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,427,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="404843994"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2015 02:21:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2J2LOQx005879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:21:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.1.29]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:21:24 -0500
From: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
Thread-Index: AQHQYSdFuDT4e8nnHkuwxDoGhp81rp0i4qQAgAAQTgA=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:21:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D12F7F4E.B97C7%dekumar@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5509C284.5000903@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [10.24.76.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AC71692B167AD64997A6BD252A7C28E3@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/a8cpkjiKh-T-FLg2rcn6vrV0_Vs>
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:21:26 -0000

I agree with Tom, Topology is technology-independent and should belong to
generic model and expand it in technology specific model with specific
like p2p, p2mp, etc..

Thanks,
Deepak

On 3/18/15 11:23 AM, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:

>Below with [PTT].
>
>On 17/03/2015 10:57 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Greg:
>...
>>
>> [Qin]: Do you proposed to add p2p and p2mp,bi-directional,
>> uni-direcational as part of LIME generic model, or add them as part of
>> technology-specific data model extensions?
>>
>[PTT] I would think topology is technology-independent as an abstract
>concept, and therefore belongs in the generic model. To bring that in
>line with reality, there would have to be interplay with the
>technology-specific models to indicate which topologies these models
>support.
>
>...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email