Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 21 March 2015 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780B51B2B20 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxHb_NPox6IB for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89FE41B2B17 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2LEaiMp032429; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:36:44 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([149.254.181.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2LEacV0032404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:36:41 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Tom Taylor'" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, "'Qin Wu'" <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "'Gregory Mirsky'" <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "'Ronald Bonica'" <rbonica@juniper.net>, <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
References: <CO1PR05MB4422C6491A3B7179F229574AE130@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F482@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84702B17@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F643@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84704C4C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92FA5F@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847066E3@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B930603@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <BLUPR05MB433DD2E1CBEDF363CB13884AE010@BLUPR05MB433.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8470BE79@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B9349F2@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <550B2FEF.1030402@gmail.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8470D37B@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <550C13BD.60209@! gmail.com> <015f01d063b9$46c0bb80$d4423280$@olddog.co.uk> <550D56C9.1030! 406@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <550D56C9.1030406@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:36:38 -0000
Message-ID: <019a01d063e4$7443fb50$5ccbf1f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHGrGBYXBNnQtTVBmeiqJ3Nn3uTlgD4jq3eAheUxdYCRvAb6AJ6KTAEAcUApFsBr78ESAKi8zADAd+lOFUCnizHtwFCFWn/Ac9O+BYB5R8EQgFgk3aaAZKEFeoCZnDAoZxUuPFw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21414.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.703-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.703-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: lORh06tOiKg4HKI/yaqRm521GZGE81yGAZn/4A9db2Ti7ECA5q90uQOw Eo1W7zIdIkxDXi0u/CsIThkg+gnWEFMorrFOp+OUngIgpj8eDcC063Wh9WVqgnXA+T8YcZkDl7B AyKmXjyPkwjHXXC/4I8ZW5ai5WKly3zlfoTTVbx9iVpvbEJ9MtaHee3myVYqpZFQ+J6dL7/ppGq 62bJxNQ0FkWTLptJ9FdiWnJBR2NWHw5s5YYU9BL1EjBkkZiyl2sJ/jxlXnd3dp9xHuM9AfUiKeU bONtgeTe1ZwdZI0d1846NqqjKQhnA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/jd9mdYWkQXDDEj9tRpTMeB3WQs4>
Cc: "'Deepak Kumar \(dekumar\)'" <dekumar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:37:01 -0000

> Bottom line: I'm saying that the generic LIME model should be able to
> trigger performance monitoring regardless of the layer under examination.

Well say "attempt to" because, if the layer doesn't support a particular OAM
function, obviously it won't be triggered.
Similarly, if an implementation is missing that function.

But beyond that, yes, there is a set of generic OAM functions that need to be in
the LIME model for config and enablement.
Since the model is generic and layer-independent, we would assume that the
function set in the LIME model is a superset of the functions in any specific
known layer.

A