IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Wed, 18 March 2015 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514871A900A for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VDO8SGBhygq for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0861A8799 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ieclw3 with SMTP id lw3so46029797iec.2 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bbMfU+4NFx4r0abRt1ZPYC38si2JPZnufzT/1WmCcDA=; b=Bw63ruSWFG6RHLldIy3KuGr0tKl+0TYlTT0HFvFJy/ZeB4ZcLoWqdClTwqFf76L6pN eZ4z5uzDMHUNmd6o7Y56Tfo77HrX8LfJH3g/IwvQOBhDvzJwCIlK6HKaIMRqbbRwXI9F peQEKwk9sdhs33Bzltvud7kIVlhnCWeiKh59IY2JrP/8EemKgU1wWKXeR9mc9n+mZa0U esYQzgb0qb67Ml/l8ApgSY3yKdtsHW3ZAiB+2geG9kk9vCzj8xW7MoBPzK8zbRrUoPUs N35KLH0KtONZ2MX/rJVG+94kN3teDbMokqbwzsG/EHdT7wUzIcmQ3J5bA2aUbD1+UOfC 8Q6Q==
X-Received: by 10.107.8.67 with SMTP id 64mr50143861ioi.61.1426702982292; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.135] (dsl-173-206-173-170.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.173.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b6sm2221889igb.15.2015.03.18.11.23.01 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5509C284.5000903@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:23:00 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
References: <CO1PR05MB4422C6491A3B7179F229574AE130@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846DF59E@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B91C5EC@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <CO1PR05MB442C0431388DF4DB33E1EF1AE180@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846E020F@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CO1PR05MB4420B81383D0952B2BB3D27AE180@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846E1E86@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F482@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84702B17@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92F643@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA84704C4C@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B92FA5F@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847066E3@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847066E3@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/qAPfjuqbJ3qBmGWRyafx0tB1Xvs>
Cc: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:23:07 -0000

Below with [PTT].

On 17/03/2015 10:57 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
> Hi, Greg:
...
>
> [Qin]: Do you proposed to add p2p and p2mp,bi-directional,
> uni-direcational as part of LIME generic model, or add them as part of
> technology-specific data model extensions?
>
[PTT] I would think topology is technology-independent as an abstract 
concept, and therefore belongs in the generic model. To bring that in 
line with reality, there would have to be interplay with the 
technology-specific models to indicate which topologies these models 
support.

...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email