Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

As Greg said, that is the opposite of what I intended. It does raise an 
interesting question: is a service like p2mp an IP service or a service 
provided by a different layer?

Tom

On 19/03/2015 9:34 PM, Deepak Kumar (dekumar) wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I was referring to following model, where topology is defined as empty
> in generic model and can be extended by technology specific OAM in their
> own Yang model.
>
> Grouping topology {
>      Choice topology {
>        Case topo-null {
>          Description
>            "this is a placeholder when no topology is needed";
>          Leaf topo-null {
>             Type empty;
>             Descroption
>               "there is no topology define, it will be define in
> technology specific."
>          }
>        }
>      }
> }
>
>
> Grouping MEP {
>
>      Leaf mep-name {
>      }
>      Uses MEP-ID;
>      Uses mp-address;
>      Leaf interface {
>      }
>      Uses topology;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Deepak
>
>
>
>
> On 3/19/15 8:22 AM, "Gregory Mirsky" <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Deepak,
>     I thought I agree with Tom that topology of monitored object, e.g.
>     p2p or mp2mp, is technology-independent OAM-wise but your view puts
>     topology against ... topology. Perhaps you can illustrate or give
>     definition to what you view as technology-independent topology and
>     how it is different from the topology of monitored object.
>
>     Regards,
>     Greg
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Deepak Kumar (dekumar) [mailto:[e-mail]]
>     Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 7:21 PM
>     To: Tom Taylor; Qin Wu; Gregory Mirsky; Ronald Bonica;
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Design Team report
>
>     I agree with Tom, Topology is technology-independent and should
>     belong to generic model and expand it in technology specific model
>     with specific like p2p, p2mp, etc..
>
>     Thanks,
>     Deepak
>
>     On 3/18/15 11:23 AM, "Tom Taylor" <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>         Below with [PTT].
>
>         On 17/03/2015 10:57 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
>
>             Hi, Greg:
>
>         ...
>
>
>             [Qin]: Do you proposed to add p2p and p2mp,bi-directional,
>             uni-direcational as part of LIME generic model, or add them
>             as part
>             of technology-specific data model extensions?
>
>         [PTT] I would think topology is technology-independent as an
>         abstract
>         concept, and therefore belongs in the generic model. To bring
>         that in
>         line with reality, there would have to be interplay with the
>         technology-specific models to indicate which topologies these
>         models
>         support.
>
>         ...
>
>
>