Re: [Lime-oam-model] Purpose of the model

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 21 December 2014 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCBA1A89C6 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 14:57:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCfy-IlQiiTK for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 14:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0777.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::777]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD211A89C5 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 14:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.12; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:56:52 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.37]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.37]) with mapi id 15.01.0049.002; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:56:51 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime-oam-model] Purpose of the model
Thread-Index: AQHQFyMd5+e2ydLjdkiC+9ZcuuZMVpyaswxQ
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:56:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR05MB442791A80BC0D9A2E1B09F2AE690@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <548CBBCA.6020603@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <548CBBCA.6020603@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
x-forefront-prvs: 0432A04947
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(51704005)(107046002)(31966008)(107886001)(74316001)(92566001)(54206007)(50986999)(99286002)(4396001)(66066001)(21056001)(64706001)(20776003)(86362001)(101416001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(33656002)(106116001)(106356001)(105586002)(97736003)(40100003)(122556002)(2900100001)(54606007)(46102003)(68736005)(87936001)(54356999)(2656002)(102836002)(2950100001)(76176999)(76576001)(77156002)(15975445007)(62966003)(230783001)(120916001)(99396003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB442; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Dec 2014 22:56:51.4726 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB442
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/ukKaCMu8qbrn4rHzk5Sz27vGLG0
Subject: Re: [Lime-oam-model] Purpose of the model
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:57:17 -0000

All,

Normally, at this point, I would like to stand back and let the design team do their work. However, it has been a week and no one has responded to Tom's question.

So, I will pose the first question from the design team charter. That is:

 - - To what degree does the choice of an OAM model influence LIME work?

Also

-- Can LIME's work be made "model agnostic"?

Now is your chance to wax philosophical! Have at it!

                                                                                Ron




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lime-oam-model [mailto:lime-oam-model-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Taylor
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 5:21 PM
> To: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lime-oam-model] Purpose of the model
> 
> Who wants to spell out the objectives of the model in detail as our starting
> point?
> 
> Tom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lime-oam-model mailing list
> Lime-oam-model@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model