[Lime-oam-model] Status

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 01 March 2015 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD41A1BF5 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 14:40:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0QG2JY68oM9 for <lime-oam-model@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 14:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0751.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:751]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F091A0015 for <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 14:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.93.16; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:40:20 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.31]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.31]) with mapi id 15.01.0093.004; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:40:20 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "lime-oam-model@ietf.org" <lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status
Thread-Index: AdBUb+kI6Mtyq6LaR7++JmP639kyRA==
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 22:40:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR05MB4422C6491A3B7179F229574AE130@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.15]
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB442DBFE50622A14DF7211BFB1130@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
x-forefront-prvs: 0502983C0E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(50986999)(2900100001)(62966003)(46102003)(221733001)(110136001)(450100001)(86362001)(122556002)(92566002)(40100003)(54356999)(76576001)(2351001)(229853001)(107886001)(77156002)(102836002)(2501003)(66066001)(99286002)(558084003)(74316001)(87936001)(33656002)(2656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB442; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2015 22:40:20.0264 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB442
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime-oam-model/zTdtulI7NM1azNhdzcof_aDGKyY>
Subject: [Lime-oam-model] Status
X-BeenThere: lime-oam-model@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LIME WG OAM Model Design Team <lime-oam-model.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lime-oam-model/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime-oam-model@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-oam-model>, <mailto:lime-oam-model-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:40:39 -0000

Folks,

Since the group's formation, we have lost two members (Nobo and Tissa). Santosh PK will replace Nobo.

Could Qin or Greg summarize that group's status for Santosh?

Also, Qin and Greg, do you think that the design team will have anything to report at IETF 92?

                                                Ron Bonica