Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR

"Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ssalam@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82181243F3 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:44:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aeFl_gMEYosn for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E271241F3 for <lime@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:44:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1266; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513583052; x=1514792652; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=tgJ1HiMd9afaMsZRaSto/H2tByci94C8riQ8C8xb9lQ=; b=VG5/WjNCXyQL/qckTCY8zmSpHzjvjc3OWynXAeoWJ3GBf3/dcWhv3zyu q9Ei2jetskUEwDN3WTN/28r0I3iF+ISx/CYYOZ6WNQQbhzwC39yaWbq4Y nvIbVmO7/4yluBM5HEePCP+iIrBq5esYQ8CSIeenm1JzzZpsCSkQV9TMg 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DBAgA3cTda/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+gVonB4N/mSyBWiaXIRSCAQqFOwIahGlBFgEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSMBAQEEIxFRBAIBCA4DBAEBAwImAgICMBUICAEBBAESiiqpP4InimgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ+CX4IOgVaCEgyCd4MvgTsBEgEfF4J+MYIyBaM8ApUqghaGE4tKlksCERkBgToBJgkpYG9vFWYBgX6EVniHVoElgRUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,421,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="327407883"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Dec 2017 07:44:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBI7iBqU002682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:44:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 01:44:10 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-003.cisco.com ([173.37.102.13]) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com ([173.37.102.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 01:44:10 -0600
From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "tsenevir@gmail.com" <tsenevir@gmail.com>, "nfinn@cisco.com" <nfinn@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
Thread-Index: AdN0JSFgBWIrM3TjQUmpEaAGUpSkbwBkgCFQAJf7pQA=
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:44:10 +0000
Message-ID: <1D9EB124-65A1-4968-80E0-8EF73992D6C2@cisco.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB2051FFCEC4B646A5DFA52B1FAE0B0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB2051FFCEC4B646A5DFA52B1FAE0B0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.148.130.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B232F22F075F6942968148670F672FEC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/26ea495rtlYFsCnAIBhAqrYq1Q8>
Subject: Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:44:15 -0000

Hi Ron,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.


Thanks
Samer

On 2017-12-15, 5:15 PM, "Ron Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

    Tissa, Norm, Samer,
    
    I am still waiting for your responses.
    
                          Ron
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ron Bonica
    > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:19 AM
    > To: 'lime@ietf.org' <lime@ietf.org>
    > Subject: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
    > 
    > Deepak, Qin, Michael, Tissa, Norm, Samer,
    > 
    > Could each of you please respond to this email stating whether you have any
    > knowledge of IPR against draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-
    > model-01?
    > 
    >  A response from each of you is required to progress this document.
    > 
    >                                                       Ron